GRPZvsAFSCETF Comparison
VS
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 GARP ETF (GRPZ) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. abrdn Focused U.S. Small Cap Active ETF (AFSC) is part of the US Small Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Finance, Healthcare and Industrials. GRPZ is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 1.09% for AFSC. GRPZ is up 21.06% year-to-date (YTD) with +$57K in YTD flows. AFSC performs better with 23.23% YTD performance, and -$6M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GRPZ and AFSC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
GRPZ vs AFSC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/14/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GRPZ AFSC | -4.59%-4.59% | +4.40%+1.27% | +21.06%+23.23% | +19.89%+22.63% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | GRPZ AFSC | -+$24K | +$645K-$875K | +$57K-$6M | +$52K-$36M | -- | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GRPZ AFSC | +14.88%+15.40% | +16.62%+18.52% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | GRPZ AFSC | -6.13%-7.38% | -9.35%-10.27% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | GRPZ AFSC | 41d25d | 67d39d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
Trading data
GRPZ | AFSC | |
Last sale 9/14/2026 at 1:30 PM | $32.00 | $36.64 |
| Previous close 09/14/2026 | $31.91 | $37.05 |
| Consolidated volume 09/14/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
AFSC
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexGRPZ | AFSC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/14/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
GRPZ | AFSC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $32.00 | $36.64 |
| 1D performance | +0.26% | -1.09% |
| AuM | $3.20 M | $9.88 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 1.09% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
GRPZ
USA
96.3%
Other
3.7%
AFSC
USA
88.79%
Other
11.21%
Sectors
GRPZ
Finance
31.68%
Healthcare
17.57%
Industrials
13.01%
Technology
11.74%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
11.41%
Other
14.58%
AFSC
Finance
24.24%
Healthcare
18.6%
Industrials
14.14%
Technology
13.44%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.38%
Other
22.2%
Advertisement
Diversification
GRPZ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
25.68%
AFSC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
42.32%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
GRPZ
Dave, Inc.
2.05%
Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.
2.00%
Sezzle, Inc.
1.98%
Millrose Properties, Inc.
1.94%
Palomar Holdings, Inc.
1.90%
Inspire Medical Systems, Inc.
1.74%
TG Therapeutics, Inc.
1.73%
TransMedics Group, Inc.
1.67%
SkyWest, Inc.
1.64%
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
1.62%
ADMA Biologics, Inc.
1.55%
QuinStreet, Inc.
1.53%
Freshpet, Inc.
1.47%
The Bancorp, Inc. (Delaware)
1.44%
SiriusPoint Ltd.
1.43%
AFSC
American Healthcare REIT, Inc.
3.45%
Brinker International, Inc.
3.16%
Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals International Plc
3.16%
Merit Medical Systems, Inc.
3.13%
Quaker Houghton
3.11%
Seacoast Banking Corp. of Florida
2.98%
Ameris Bancorp
2.84%
Wintrust Financial Corp.
2.84%
Q2 Holdings, Inc.
2.67%
Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.
2.59%
AZZ, Inc.
2.56%
JFrog Ltd.
2.48%
StoneX Group, Inc.
2.47%
PJT Partners, Inc.
2.45%
Impinj, Inc.
2.43%
Frequently asked questions about GRPZ and AFSC
How have the GRPZ and AFSC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 14, 2026, GRPZ is up 21.06% year-to-date (YTD), while AFSC has returned 23.23%. That puts AFSC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GRPZ or AFSC?
Year-to-date, the GRPZ ETF saw +$57K in flows, compared to -$6M for AFSC.
Which ETF is more volatile: GRPZ or AFSC?
Over the past year, GRPZ had a volatility of 16.62%, while AFSC experienced 18.52%.
Which ETF is bigger: GRPZ or AFSC?
As of September 14, 2026, GRPZ holds $3.20 M in assets under management (AUM), while AFSC manages $9.88 M.
What sectors do the GRPZ and AFSC ETFs invest in?
GRPZ leans toward sectors like Finance, Healthcare and Industrials. Meanwhile, AFSC focuses on Finance, Healthcare and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the GRPZ ETF and AFSC ETF?
GRPZ top holdings include Dave, Inc., Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. and Sezzle, Inc.. AFSC holds in its top three: American Healthcare REIT, Inc., Brinker International, Inc. and Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals International Plc.
Which ETF is more diversified: GRPZ or AFSC?
GRPZ holds 88 securities with 25.68% of its assets in the top 15. AFSC has 43 securities and a top 15 weight of 42.32%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
