Open Now: The Global ETF Survey Take the Survey →

Advertisement

GRPMvsXMHQETF Comparison

ETF 1
GRPM

Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF

This fund is part of
US Multi-Factor
-0.24%
VS
ETF 2
XMHQ

Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF

This fund is part of
US Multi-Factor
-0.24%

Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF (GRPM) and Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. GRPM's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Healthcare and Technology. In contrast, XMHQ's top sector exposures are Industrials, Healthcare and Finance. GRPM is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.31% for XMHQ. GRPM is up 10.98% year-to-date (YTD) with -$68M in YTD flows. XMHQ performs worse with 9.57% YTD performance, and -$185M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GRPM and XMHQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios.  Discover our library of Model portfolios

GRPM vs XMHQ performance and flow charts

Performance

-1.00.01.02.03.04.05.0%Jun 22Jun 29Jul 7Jul 14

Cumulative Flows

-50 M-40 M-30 M-20 M-10 M0 MJun 22Jun 29Jul 7Jul 14

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/20/2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y5Y
Perf.
GRPM
XMHQ
+4.19%+0.71%
+5.21%+2.88%
+10.98%+9.57%
+19.39%+13.91%
+44.59%+43.77%
+55.63%+62.90%
Flows
GRPM
XMHQ
-$8M-$53M
-$36M-$68M
-$68M-$185M
-$57M-$154M
+$141M+$3.26B
+$234M+$4.00B
Volatility and drawdown
3M1Y3Y5Y
Volatility
GRPM
XMHQ
+12.54%+14.84%
+15.79%+15.62%
+19.89%+18.49%
+20.75%+20.63%
Max drawdown
GRPM
XMHQ
-2.85%-5.06%
-7.71%-8.74%
-27.87%-24.40%
-27.87%-25.16%
Max drawdown duration
GRPM
XMHQ
23d27d
66d116d
421d415d
421d597d
Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free
GRPM
XMHQ
Last sale
7/20/2026 at 7:59 PM
$132.09
$112.62
Previous close
07/20/2026
$132.90
$111.94
Consolidated volume
07/20/2026
Average volume
30 days
Average discount or premium
30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread
30 days
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free
GRPM
XMHQ
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/20/2026 at 7:59 PM
Live
Closed
GRPM
XMHQ
Last price
$132.09
$112.62
1D performance
-0.61%
+0.61%
AuM$476.15 M$5.33 B
E/R0.35%0.31%
Characteristics
GRPM
XMHQ
Management strategyPassivePassive
ProviderInvescoInvesco
BenchmarkS&P MidCap 400 GARP IndexS&P MidCap 400 Quality Index
N° of holdings6080
Asset classEquitiesEquities
Trailing 12m distribution yield
Join
Join
Inception dateDecember 3, 2010December 1, 2006
ESGNoNo
Advertisement
Exposure

Countries

GRPM
USA
93.29%
Other
6.71%
XMHQ
USA
92.89%
Other
7.11%

Sectors

GRPM
Finance
25.67%
Healthcare
19.16%
Technology
16.84%
Industrials
7.14%
Other
31.19%
XMHQ
Industrials
22.9%
Healthcare
16.56%
Finance
15.44%
Technology
12.76%
Non-Energy Materi.
11.25%
Other
21.1%
Advertisement

Diversification

GRPM

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

34.09%
XMHQ

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

42.1%

Top 15 holdings

Data as of June 30, 2026
GRPM
Duolingo, Inc.
2.57%
RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
2.51%
InterDigital, Inc.
2.49%
Hecla Mining Co.
2.46%
Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
2.39%
Kinsale Capital Group, Inc.
2.32%
Carpenter Technology Corp.
2.32%
Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
2.29%
Globus Medical, Inc.
2.23%
Medpace Holdings, Inc.
2.17%
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
2.17%
TechnipFMC plc
2.07%
Exelixis, Inc.
2.06%
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
2.03%
SLM Corp.
2.01%
XMHQ
TechnipFMC plc
3.82%
Illumina, Inc.
3.73%
Curtiss-Wright Corp.
3.41%
nVent Electric Plc
3.19%
Carpenter Technology Corp.
3.15%
Everpure, Inc.
3.02%
Medpace Holdings, Inc.
2.94%
Exelixis, Inc.
2.87%
United Therapeutics Corp.
2.73%
Nextpower, Inc.
2.48%
Evercore, Inc.
2.44%
Carlisle Cos., Inc.
2.43%
Manhattan Associates, Inc.
2.07%
Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.
1.92%
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
1.91%
Frequently asked questions about GRPM and XMHQ

How have the GRPM and XMHQ ETFs performed in 2026?

As of July 20, 2026, GRPM is up 10.98% year-to-date (YTD), while XMHQ has returned 9.57%. That puts GRPM better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GRPM or XMHQ?

Year-to-date, the GRPM ETF saw -$68M in flows, compared to -$185M for XMHQ.

Which ETF is more volatile: GRPM or XMHQ?

Over the past year, GRPM had a volatility of 15.79%, while XMHQ experienced 15.62%.

Which ETF is bigger: GRPM or XMHQ?

As of July 20, 2026, GRPM holds $476.15 M in assets under management (AUM), while XMHQ manages $5.33 B.

What sectors do the GRPM and XMHQ ETFs invest in?

GRPM leans toward sectors like Finance, Healthcare and Technology. Meanwhile, XMHQ focuses on Industrials, Healthcare and Finance.

What are the top holdings of the GRPM ETF and XMHQ ETF?

GRPM top holdings include Duolingo, Inc., RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. and InterDigital, Inc.. XMHQ holds in its top three: TechnipFMC plc, Illumina, Inc. and Curtiss-Wright Corp..

Which ETF is more diversified: GRPM or XMHQ?

GRPM holds 60 securities with 34.09% of its assets in the top 15. XMHQ has 80 securities and a top 15 weight of 42.1%.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Global ETF Survey 2026

The ETF Industry Is Evolving Fast

From AI infrastructure to active strategies, the ETF landscape is shifting. Share your perspective in the 7th Annual Global ETF Survey and get exclusive early access to the final report.

Global ETF Survey 2026