BROUGHT TO YOU BY:

ETF Portfolio Builder

New

ETF Portfolio Builder

New

GRPMvsXMHQETF Comparison

ETF 1

GRPM

Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF

This fund is part of

US Multi-Factor

-0.91%

Full GRPM fund page

VS

ETF 2

XMHQ

Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF

This fund is part of

US Multi-Factor

-0.91%

Full XMHQ fund page

Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF (GRPM) and Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. GRPM's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Healthcare and Technology. In contrast, XMHQ's top sector exposures are Industrials, Healthcare and Finance. GRPM is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.31% for XMHQ. GRPM is up 17.63% year-to-date (YTD) with -$59M in YTD flows. XMHQ performs worse with 12.08% YTD performance, and -$151M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GRPM and XMHQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios

GRPM vs XMHQ performance and flow charts

Performance

Cumulative Flows

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Data Services

Historic performance and flows

Data as of 10/16/2026

		1M	3M	YTD	1Y	3Y	5Y
Perf.	GRPM XMHQ	+0.19%+0.47%	+4.98%+1.14%	+17.63%+12.08%	+21.53%+10.69%	+66.07%+51.67%	+57.71%+58.14%
Flows	GRPM XMHQ	+$6M+$35M	+$6M+$10M	-$59M-$151M	-$5M-$219M	+$157M+$2.91B	+$250M+$4.03B

Volatility and drawdown

		3M	1Y	3Y	5Y
Volatility	GRPM XMHQ	+13.80%+11.88%	+14.85%+14.72%	+19.75%+18.29%	+20.74%+20.48%
Max drawdown	GRPM XMHQ	-7.33%-6.74%	-7.71%-8.39%	-27.87%-24.40%	-27.87%-25.16%
Max drawdown duration	GRPM XMHQ	50d61d	66d102d	421d415d	421d597d

Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free

	GRPM	XMHQ
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM	$140.00	$114.26
Previous close 10/15/2026	$141.45	$115.22
Consolidated volume 10/15/2026
Average volume 30 days
Average discount or premium 30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days

Replication quality

Data as of September 30, 2026

1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free

	GRPM	XMHQ
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst

Main metrics

Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM

Live

Closed

	GRPM	XMHQ
Last price	$140.00	$114.26
1D performance	-1.03%	-0.83%
AuM	$512.51 M	$5.48 B
E/R	0.35%	0.31%

Characteristics

	GRPM	XMHQ
Management strategy	Passive	Passive
Provider	Invesco	Invesco
Benchmark	S&P MidCap 400 GARP Index	S&P MidCap 400 Quality Index
N° of holdings	60	80
Asset class	Equities	Equities
Trailing 12m distribution yield	Join	Join
Inception date	December 3, 2010	December 1, 2006
ESG	No	No

More GRPM data on Trackinsight

More XMHQ data on Trackinsight

Exposure

Countries

GRPM

USA

93.97%

Other

6.03%

XMHQ

USA

93.28%

Other

6.72%

Sectors

GRPM

Finance

24.97%

Healthcare

18.86%

Technology

18.71%

Other

37.47%

XMHQ

Industrials

20.4%

Healthcare

16.98%

Finance

15.4%

Technology

15.33%

Non-Energy Materi.

10.27%

Energy

7.34%

Other

14.28%

Diversification

GRPM

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

37.03%

XMHQ

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

42.14%

Top 15 holdings

Data as of August 31, 2026

GRPM

Abercrombie & Fitch Co.

3.24%

Hecla Mining Co.

3.01%

Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.

2.75%

InterDigital, Inc.

2.68%

Duolingo, Inc.

2.68%

AppFolio, Inc.

2.63%

Kinsale Capital Group, Inc.

2.40%

SharkNinja, Inc.

2.37%

Paylocity Holding Corp.

2.36%

RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.

2.30%

Medpace Holdings, Inc.

2.24%

TechnipFMC plc

2.18%

Tenet Healthcare Corp.

2.11%

Qualys, Inc.

2.10%

Hamilton Lane, Inc.

1.98%

XMHQ

Illumina, Inc.

4.49%

TechnipFMC plc

4.24%

Everpure, Inc.

4.05%

Medpace Holdings, Inc.

3.19%

Manhattan Associates, Inc.

3.14%

nVent Electric Plc

2.84%

Exelixis, Inc.

2.70%

Curtiss-Wright Corp.

2.58%

United Therapeutics Corp.

2.48%

Carpenter Technology Corp.

2.45%

Carlisle Cos., Inc.

2.11%

Hecla Mining Co.

2.03%

Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.

1.95%

Evercore, Inc.

1.95%

Nextpower, Inc.

1.94%

Frequently asked questions about GRPM and XMHQ

How have the GRPM and XMHQ ETFs performed in 2026?

As of October 16, 2026, GRPM is up 17.63% year-to-date (YTD), while XMHQ has returned 12.08%. That puts GRPM better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GRPM or XMHQ?

Year-to-date, the GRPM ETF saw -$59M in flows, compared to -$151M for XMHQ.

Which ETF is more volatile: GRPM or XMHQ?

Over the past year, GRPM had a volatility of 14.85%, while XMHQ experienced 14.72%.

Which ETF is bigger: GRPM or XMHQ?

As of October 16, 2026, GRPM holds $512.51 M in assets under management (AUM), while XMHQ manages $5.48 B.

What sectors do the GRPM and XMHQ ETFs invest in?

GRPM leans toward sectors like Finance, Healthcare and Technology. Meanwhile, XMHQ focuses on Industrials, Healthcare and Finance.

What are the top holdings of the GRPM ETF and XMHQ ETF?

GRPM top holdings include Abercrombie & Fitch Co., Hecla Mining Co. and Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.. XMHQ holds in its top three: Illumina, Inc., TechnipFMC plc and Everpure, Inc..

GRPMvsXMHQETF Comparison

Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF

Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF

GRPM vs XMHQ performance and flow charts

Performance

Cumulative Flows

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Countries

Sectors

Diversification

Top 15 holdings

How have the GRPM and XMHQ ETFs performed in 2026?

As of October 16, 2026, GRPM is up 17.63% year-to-date (YTD), while XMHQ has returned 12.08%. That puts GRPM better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GRPM or XMHQ?

Year-to-date, the GRPM ETF saw -$59M in flows, compared to -$151M for XMHQ.

Which ETF is more volatile: GRPM or XMHQ?

Over the past year, GRPM had a volatility of 14.85%, while XMHQ experienced 14.72%.

Which ETF is bigger: GRPM or XMHQ?

As of October 16, 2026, GRPM holds $512.51 M in assets under management (AUM), while XMHQ manages $5.48 B.

What sectors do the GRPM and XMHQ ETFs invest in?

GRPM leans toward sectors like Finance, Healthcare and Technology. Meanwhile, XMHQ focuses on Industrials, Healthcare and Finance.

What are the top holdings of the GRPM ETF and XMHQ ETF?

GRPM top holdings include Abercrombie & Fitch Co., Hecla Mining Co. and Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.. XMHQ holds in its top three: Illumina, Inc., TechnipFMC plc and Everpure, Inc..

Which ETF is more diversified: GRPM or XMHQ?

GRPM holds 60 securities with 37.03% of its assets in the top 15. XMHQ has 80 securities and a top 15 weight of 42.14%.

Build and Analyze Your ETF Portfolio Like a Pro