Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
GRPMvsXMHQETF Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF (GRPM) and Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. GRPM's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, XMHQ's top sector exposures are Health Care, Industrials and Financials. GRPM is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.31% for XMHQ. GRPM is down -0.77% year-to-date (YTD) with -$20M in YTD flows. XMHQ performs better with 1.75% YTD performance, and -$40M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GRPM and XMHQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
GRPM vs XMHQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GRPM XMHQ | -3.99%-3.32% | -3.92%-0.26% | -0.77%+1.75% | +16.13%+14.82% | +46.74%+59.20% | +40.01%+50.30% |
| Flows | GRPM XMHQ | -$27M-$55M | -$22M-$66M | -$20M-$40M | -$114M-$964M | +$217M+$3.94B | +$304M+$4.23B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GRPM XMHQ | +15.66%+14.01% | +23.43%+20.41% | +20.27%+18.63% | +20.98%+20.75% |
| Max drawdown | GRPM XMHQ | -5.16%-4.95% | -16.57%-13.30% | -27.87%-24.40% | -27.87%-25.16% |
| Max drawdown duration | GRPM XMHQ | 30d48d | 91d43d | 421d415d | 421d597d |
GRPM | XMHQ | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $116.55 | $101.96 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $118.52 | $104.24 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
GRPM | XMHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
GRPM | XMHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $116.55 | $101.96 |
| 1D performance | -1.66% | -2.19% |
| AuM | $474.67 M | $5.11 B |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.31% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the GRPM and XMHQ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, GRPM is down -0.77% year-to-date (YTD), while XMHQ has returned 1.75%. That puts XMHQ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GRPM or XMHQ?
Year-to-date, the GRPM ETF saw -$20M in flows, compared to -$40M for XMHQ.
Which ETF is more volatile: GRPM or XMHQ?
Over the past year, GRPM had a volatility of 23.43%, while XMHQ experienced 20.41%.
Which ETF is bigger: GRPM or XMHQ?
As of March 11, 2026, GRPM holds $474.67 M in assets under management (AUM), while XMHQ manages $5.11 B.
What sectors do the GRPM and XMHQ ETFs invest in?
GRPM leans toward sectors like Financials, Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, XMHQ focuses on Health Care, Industrials and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the GRPM ETF and XMHQ ETF?
GRPM top holdings include LANTHEUS HOLDINGS, RENAISSANCERE and APPFOLIO INC. XMHQ holds in its top three: ILLUMINA, MEDPACE HOLDINGS INC and TECHNIPFMC PLC.
Which ETF is more diversified: GRPM or XMHQ?
GRPM holds 60 securities with 33.68% of its assets in the top 15. XMHQ has 80 securities and a top 15 weight of 40.02%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
