Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
GRPMvsSMCOETF Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF (GRPM) and Hilton Small-MidCap Opportunity ETF (SMCO) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. GRPM's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, SMCO's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. GRPM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.55% for SMCO. GRPM is down -0.77% year-to-date (YTD) with -$20M in YTD flows. SMCO performs better with 2.24% YTD performance, and +$9M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GRPM and SMCO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
GRPM vs SMCO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GRPM SMCO | -3.99%-6.57% | -3.92%-1.26% | -0.77%+2.24% | +16.13%+17.97% | +46.74%n/a | +40.01%n/a |
| Flows | GRPM SMCO | -$27M-$1M | -$22M+$11M | -$20M+$9M | -$114M+$31M | +$217M- | +$304M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GRPM SMCO | +15.66%+16.51% | +23.43%+20.15% | +20.27%n/a | +20.98%n/a |
| Max drawdown | GRPM SMCO | -5.16%-6.69% | -16.57%-13.74% | -27.87%n/a | -27.87%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | GRPM SMCO | 30d31d | 91d46d | 421dn/a | 421dn/a |
GRPM | SMCO | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $116.55 | $26.82 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $118.52 | $27.35 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
GRPM | SMCO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
GRPM | SMCO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $116.55 | $26.82 |
| 1D performance | -1.66% | -1.92% |
| AuM | $474.67 M | $145.70 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.55% |
GRPM | SMCO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Invesco | Hilton Capital Management |
| Benchmark | S&P MidCap 400 GARP Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 57 | 60 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 3, 2010 | November 28, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the GRPM and SMCO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, GRPM is down -0.77% year-to-date (YTD), while SMCO has returned 2.24%. That puts SMCO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GRPM or SMCO?
Year-to-date, the GRPM ETF saw -$20M in flows, compared to +$9M for SMCO.
Which ETF is more volatile: GRPM or SMCO?
Over the past year, GRPM had a volatility of 23.43%, while SMCO experienced 20.15%.
Which ETF is bigger: GRPM or SMCO?
As of March 11, 2026, GRPM holds $474.67 M in assets under management (AUM), while SMCO manages $145.70 M.
What sectors do the GRPM and SMCO ETFs invest in?
GRPM leans toward sectors like Financials, Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, SMCO focuses on Information Technology, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the GRPM ETF and SMCO ETF?
GRPM top holdings include LANTHEUS HOLDINGS, RENAISSANCERE and APPFOLIO INC. SMCO holds in its top three: DYCOM INDUSTRIES, TELEDYNE TECH and CIENA.
Which ETF is more diversified: GRPM or SMCO?
GRPM holds 60 securities with 33.68% of its assets in the top 15. SMCO has 62 securities and a top 15 weight of 35.52%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
