GRPMvsQMIDETF Comparison
VS
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF (GRPM) and WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. GRPM's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Healthcare and Technology. In contrast, QMID's top sector exposures are Technology, Healthcare and Industrials. GRPM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.38% for QMID. GRPM is up 20.24% year-to-date (YTD) with -$76M in YTD flows. QMID performs worse with 6.51% YTD performance, and +$700K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GRPM and QMID below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
GRPM vs QMID performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/01/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GRPM QMID | +4.03%-0.15% | +12.27%+3.03% | +20.24%+6.51% | +20.92%+7.15% | +57.14%n/a | +61.69%n/a |
| Flows | GRPM QMID | -$1M- | -$23M- | -$76M+$700K | -$29M+$704K | +$118M- | +$233M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GRPM QMID | +14.06%+13.71% | +15.48%+14.87% | +19.96%n/a | +20.78%n/a |
| Max drawdown | GRPM QMID | -2.79%-3.09% | -7.71%-10.70% | -27.87%n/a | -27.87%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | GRPM QMID | 16d8d | 66d160d | 421dn/a | 421dn/a |
Trading data
GRPM | QMID | |
Last sale 9/2/2026 at 1:30 PM | $144.27 | $30.23 |
| Previous close 09/01/2026 | $143.26 | $30.08 |
| Consolidated volume 09/01/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
GRPM | QMID | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/2/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
GRPM | QMID | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $144.27 | $30.23 |
| 1D performance | +0.70% | +0.53% |
| AuM | $507.30 M | $2.26 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.38% |
Characteristics
GRPM | QMID | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | WisdomTree |
| Benchmark | S&P MidCap 400 GARP Index | WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth MidCap Index |
| N° of holdings | 60 | 124 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 3, 2010 | January 25, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
GRPM
USA
93.81%
Other
6.19%
QMID
USA
94.26%
Other
5.74%
Sectors
GRPM
Finance
26.16%
Healthcare
19.12%
Technology
17.52%
Other
37.2%
QMID
Technology
18.26%
Healthcare
17.86%
Industrials
15.12%
Finance
13.85%
Consumer Services
11.51%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.24%
Other
16.15%
Advertisement
Diversification
GRPM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
34.2%
QMID
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
19.13%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
GRPM
Duolingo, Inc.
2.80%
Kinsale Capital Group, Inc.
2.52%
RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
2.47%
Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
2.43%
Paylocity Holding Corp.
2.30%
Medpace Holdings, Inc.
2.28%
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
2.28%
AppFolio, Inc.
2.25%
InterDigital, Inc.
2.22%
TechnipFMC plc
2.18%
Tenet Healthcare Corp.
2.16%
Hecla Mining Co.
2.12%
SharkNinja, Inc.
2.09%
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
2.06%
Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
2.05%
QMID
Tenet Healthcare Corp.
1.85%
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
1.38%
Toast, Inc.
1.36%
Medpace Holdings, Inc.
1.29%
Everest Group Ltd.
1.29%
DaVita, Inc.
1.27%
Permian Resources Corp.
1.25%
Atlassian Corp.
1.21%
Ralph Lauren Corp.
1.21%
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
1.19%
Deckers Outdoor Corp.
1.19%
Somnigroup International, Inc.
1.18%
Nutanix, Inc.
1.16%
lululemon athletica, Inc.
1.16%
TKO Group Holdings, Inc.
1.16%
Frequently asked questions about GRPM and QMID
How have the GRPM and QMID ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 1, 2026, GRPM is up 20.24% year-to-date (YTD), while QMID has returned 6.51%. That puts GRPM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GRPM or QMID?
Year-to-date, the GRPM ETF saw -$76M in flows, compared to +$700K for QMID.
Which ETF is more volatile: GRPM or QMID?
Over the past year, GRPM had a volatility of 15.48%, while QMID experienced 14.87%.
Which ETF is bigger: GRPM or QMID?
As of September 1, 2026, GRPM holds $507.30 M in assets under management (AUM), while QMID manages $2.26 M.
What sectors do the GRPM and QMID ETFs invest in?
GRPM leans toward sectors like Finance, Healthcare and Technology. Meanwhile, QMID focuses on Technology, Healthcare and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the GRPM ETF and QMID ETF?
GRPM top holdings include Duolingo, Inc., Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. and RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.. QMID holds in its top three: Tenet Healthcare Corp., Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. and Toast, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: GRPM or QMID?
GRPM holds 60 securities with 34.2% of its assets in the top 15. QMID has 124 securities and a top 15 weight of 19.13%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
