Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
GRPMvsQMIDETF Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF (GRPM) and WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. GRPM's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, QMID's top sector exposures are Industrials, Consumer Discretionary and Information Technology. GRPM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.38% for QMID. GRPM is down -0.77% year-to-date (YTD) with -$20M in YTD flows. QMID performs worse with -1.41% YTD performance, and +$706K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GRPM and QMID below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
GRPM vs QMID performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GRPM QMID | -3.99%-3.91% | -3.92%-4.56% | -0.77%-1.41% | +16.13%+11.96% | +46.74%n/a | +40.01%n/a |
| Flows | GRPM QMID | -$27M+$706K | -$22M+$706K | -$20M+$706K | -$114M+$710K | +$217M- | +$304M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GRPM QMID | +15.66%+14.08% | +23.43%+20.55% | +20.27%n/a | +20.98%n/a |
| Max drawdown | GRPM QMID | -5.16%-5.53% | -16.57%-13.86% | -27.87%n/a | -27.87%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | GRPM QMID | 30d48d | 91d46d | 421dn/a | 421dn/a |
GRPM | QMID | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $116.55 | $27.33 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $118.52 | $27.85 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
GRPM | QMID | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
GRPM | QMID | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $116.55 | $27.33 |
| 1D performance | -1.66% | -1.86% |
| AuM | $474.67 M | $2.09 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.38% |
GRPM | QMID | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | WisdomTree |
| Benchmark | S&P MidCap 400 GARP Index | WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth MidCap Index |
| N° of holdings | 57 | 120 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 3, 2010 | January 25, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the GRPM and QMID ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, GRPM is down -0.77% year-to-date (YTD), while QMID has lost -1.41%. That puts GRPM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GRPM or QMID?
Year-to-date, the GRPM ETF saw -$20M in flows, compared to +$706K for QMID.
Which ETF is more volatile: GRPM or QMID?
Over the past year, GRPM had a volatility of 23.43%, while QMID experienced 20.55%.
Which ETF is bigger: GRPM or QMID?
As of March 11, 2026, GRPM holds $474.67 M in assets under management (AUM), while QMID manages $2.09 M.
What sectors do the GRPM and QMID ETFs invest in?
GRPM leans toward sectors like Financials, Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, QMID focuses on Industrials, Consumer Discretionary and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the GRPM ETF and QMID ETF?
GRPM top holdings include LANTHEUS HOLDINGS, RENAISSANCERE and APPFOLIO INC. QMID holds in its top three: US65290E1010, ATI INC and COEUR MINING INC.
Which ETF is more diversified: GRPM or QMID?
GRPM holds 60 securities with 33.68% of its assets in the top 15. QMID has 125 securities and a top 15 weight of 18.78%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
