GRPMvsQMIDETF Comparison
VS
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF (GRPM) and WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. GRPM's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Energy and Technology. In contrast, QMID's top sector exposures are Industrials, Healthcare and Technology. GRPM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.38% for QMID. GRPM is up 11.55% year-to-date (YTD) with -$67M in YTD flows. QMID performs worse with 3.75% YTD performance, and +$700K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GRPM and QMID below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
GRPM vs QMID performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/17/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GRPM QMID | +4.99%+2.48% | +6.53%+1.78% | +11.55%+3.75% | +18.54%+7.49% | +46.81%n/a | +60.74%n/a |
| Flows | GRPM QMID | -$153M- | -$35M-$6K | -$67M+$700K | -$61M+$704K | +$141M- | +$236M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GRPM QMID | +12.55%+12.81% | +15.78%+15.00% | +19.87%n/a | +20.78%n/a |
| Max drawdown | GRPM QMID | -2.85%-4.16% | -7.71%-10.70% | -27.87%n/a | -27.87%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | GRPM QMID | 23d38d | 66d160d | 421dn/a | 421dn/a |
Trading data
GRPM | QMID | |
Last sale 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM | $132.90 | $29.32 |
| Previous close 07/16/2026 | $133.41 | $29.46 |
| Consolidated volume 07/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
GRPM | QMID | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
GRPM | QMID | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $132.90 | $29.32 |
| 1D performance | -0.38% | -0.50% |
| AuM | $479.91 M | $2.20 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.38% |
Characteristics
GRPM | QMID | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | WisdomTree |
| Benchmark | S&P MidCap 400 GARP Index | WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth MidCap Index |
| N° of holdings | 58 | 125 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 3, 2010 | January 25, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
GRPM
USA
92.91%
Other
7.09%
QMID
USA
94.42%
Other
5.58%
Sectors
GRPM
Finance
32.95%
Energy
13.48%
Technology
12.38%
Healthcare
12.28%
Industrials
7.86%
Other
21.04%
QMID
Industrials
22.69%
Healthcare
14.09%
Technology
13.67%
Finance
12.7%
Consumer Services
10.31%
Non-Energy Materi.
8.25%
Other
18.28%
Advertisement
Diversification
GRPM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
38.54%
QMID
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
21.97%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of May 31, 2026
GRPM
Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
4.32%
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
3.47%
Rambus, Inc.
3.04%
Carpenter Technology Corp.
2.83%
Valaris Ltd.
2.78%
TechnipFMC plc
2.75%
RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
2.66%
Permian Resources Corp.
2.64%
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
2.25%
East West Bancorp, Inc.
2.16%
Bank OZK
2.10%
NOV, Inc.
1.96%
Visteon Corp.
1.86%
Dynatrace, Inc.
1.86%
UMB Financial Corp.
1.85%
QMID
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
2.15%
ATI, Inc.
1.99%
Roivant Sciences Ltd.
1.74%
Nextpower, Inc.
1.70%
Rambus, Inc.
1.43%
Roku, Inc.
1.42%
Deckers Outdoor Corp.
1.34%
Modine Manufacturing Co.
1.33%
Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc.
1.31%
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
1.30%
Mueller Industries, Inc.
1.29%
Performance Food Group Co.
1.25%
Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.
1.25%
Everest Group Ltd.
1.24%
Permian Resources Corp.
1.21%
Frequently asked questions about GRPM and QMID
How have the GRPM and QMID ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 17, 2026, GRPM is up 11.55% year-to-date (YTD), while QMID has returned 3.75%. That puts GRPM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GRPM or QMID?
Year-to-date, the GRPM ETF saw -$67M in flows, compared to +$700K for QMID.
Which ETF is more volatile: GRPM or QMID?
Over the past year, GRPM had a volatility of 15.78%, while QMID experienced 15%.
Which ETF is bigger: GRPM or QMID?
As of July 17, 2026, GRPM holds $479.91 M in assets under management (AUM), while QMID manages $2.20 M.
What sectors do the GRPM and QMID ETFs invest in?
GRPM leans toward sectors like Finance, Energy and Technology. Meanwhile, QMID focuses on Industrials, Healthcare and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the GRPM ETF and QMID ETF?
GRPM top holdings include Lantheus Holdings, Inc., Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. and Rambus, Inc.. QMID holds in its top three: Sterling Infrastructure, Inc., ATI, Inc. and Roivant Sciences Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: GRPM or QMID?
GRPM holds 58 securities with 38.54% of its assets in the top 15. QMID has 125 securities and a top 15 weight of 21.97%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
