Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
GRPMvsPAMCETF Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF (GRPM) and Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. GRPM's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, PAMC's top sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary, Information Technology and Financials. GRPM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.6% for PAMC. GRPM is down -0.77% year-to-date (YTD) with -$20M in YTD flows. PAMC performs better with 4.78% YTD performance, and -$79K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GRPM and PAMC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
GRPM vs PAMC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GRPM PAMC | -3.99%-3.37% | -3.92%+1.05% | -0.77%+4.78% | +16.13%+17.63% | +46.74%+58.87% | +40.01%+42.28% |
| Flows | GRPM PAMC | -$27M-$12K | -$22M-$2M | -$20M-$79K | -$114M-$20M | +$217M+$6M | +$304M+$19M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GRPM PAMC | +15.66%+18.55% | +23.43%+20.34% | +20.27%+18.07% | +20.98%+20.48% |
| Max drawdown | GRPM PAMC | -5.16%-6.15% | -16.57%-13.36% | -27.87%-25.78% | -27.87%-27.11% |
| Max drawdown duration | GRPM PAMC | 30d17d | 91d43d | 421d422d | 421d955d |
GRPM | PAMC | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $116.55 | $47.50 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $118.52 | $48.69 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
GRPM | PAMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
GRPM | PAMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $116.55 | $47.50 |
| 1D performance | -1.66% | -2.45% |
| AuM | $474.67 M | $58.46 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.6% |
GRPM | PAMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | PACER ETFs |
| Benchmark | S&P MidCap 400 GARP Index | Lunt Capital U.S. MidCap Multi-Factor Rotation Index |
| N° of holdings | 57 | 134 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 3, 2010 | June 24, 2020 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the GRPM and PAMC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, GRPM is down -0.77% year-to-date (YTD), while PAMC has returned 4.78%. That puts PAMC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GRPM or PAMC?
Year-to-date, the GRPM ETF saw -$20M in flows, compared to -$79K for PAMC.
Which ETF is more volatile: GRPM or PAMC?
Over the past year, GRPM had a volatility of 23.43%, while PAMC experienced 20.34%.
Which ETF is bigger: GRPM or PAMC?
As of March 11, 2026, GRPM holds $474.67 M in assets under management (AUM), while PAMC manages $58.46 M.
What sectors do the GRPM and PAMC ETFs invest in?
GRPM leans toward sectors like Financials, Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, PAMC focuses on Consumer Discretionary, Information Technology and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the GRPM ETF and PAMC ETF?
GRPM top holdings include LANTHEUS HOLDINGS, RENAISSANCERE and APPFOLIO INC. PAMC holds in its top three: ALCOA CORP, ECHOSTAR and TD SYNNEX.
Which ETF is more diversified: GRPM or PAMC?
GRPM holds 60 securities with 33.68% of its assets in the top 15. PAMC has 139 securities and a top 15 weight of 21.18%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
