Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
GRPMvsFFSMETF Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF (GRPM) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF (FFSM) is part of the Global Blended Cap segment. GRPM's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, FFSM's top sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. GRPM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.43% for FFSM. GRPM is down -0.77% year-to-date (YTD) with -$20M in YTD flows. FFSM performs better with 5.85% YTD performance, and +$96M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GRPM and FFSM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
GRPM vs FFSM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GRPM FFSM | -3.99%-4.18% | -3.92%+2.04% | -0.77%+5.85% | +16.13%+30.95% | +46.74%+64.16% | +40.01%+50.48% |
| Flows | GRPM FFSM | -$27M+$26M | -$22M+$130M | -$20M+$96M | -$114M+$139M | +$217M+$926M | +$304M+$947M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GRPM FFSM | +15.66%+17.68% | +23.43%+21.84% | +20.27%+18.79% | +20.98%+20.37% |
| Max drawdown | GRPM FFSM | -5.16%-6.64% | -16.57%-14.98% | -27.87%-24.54% | -27.87%-26.71% |
| Max drawdown duration | GRPM FFSM | 30d13d | 91d46d | 421d283d | 421d828d |
GRPM | FFSM | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $116.55 | $31.70 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $118.52 | $32.46 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
GRPM | FFSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
GRPM | FFSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $116.55 | $31.70 |
| 1D performance | -1.66% | -2.34% |
| AuM | $474.67 M | $1.10 B |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.43% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the GRPM and FFSM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, GRPM is down -0.77% year-to-date (YTD), while FFSM has returned 5.85%. That puts FFSM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GRPM or FFSM?
Year-to-date, the GRPM ETF saw -$20M in flows, compared to +$96M for FFSM.
Which ETF is more volatile: GRPM or FFSM?
Over the past year, GRPM had a volatility of 23.43%, while FFSM experienced 21.84%.
Which ETF is bigger: GRPM or FFSM?
As of March 11, 2026, GRPM holds $474.67 M in assets under management (AUM), while FFSM manages $1.10 B.
What sectors do the GRPM and FFSM ETFs invest in?
GRPM leans toward sectors like Financials, Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, FFSM focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the GRPM ETF and FFSM ETF?
GRPM top holdings include LANTHEUS HOLDINGS, RENAISSANCERE and APPFOLIO INC. FFSM holds in its top three: FABRINET, TEMPUR PEDIC INTERNATIONAL and LUMENTUM HOLDINGS.
Which ETF is more diversified: GRPM or FFSM?
GRPM holds 60 securities with 33.68% of its assets in the top 15. FFSM has 800 securities and a top 15 weight of 24.54%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
