Open Now: The Global ETF Survey Take the Survey →

Advertisement
Advertisement

GRPMvsFFSMETF Comparison

ETF 1
GRPM

Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF

This fund is part of
US Multi-Factor
-0.62%
VS
ETF 2
FFSM

Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF

This fund is part of
Global Blended Cap
-0.71%

Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF (GRPM) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF (FFSM) is part of the Global Blended Cap segment. GRPM's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Energy and Technology. In contrast, FFSM's top sector exposures are Industrials, Finance and Technology. GRPM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.43% for FFSM. GRPM is up 11.55% year-to-date (YTD) with -$67M in YTD flows. FFSM performs better with 19.73% YTD performance, and +$287M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GRPM and FFSM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios.  Discover our library of Model portfolios

GRPM vs FFSM performance and flow charts

Performance

-1.00.01.02.03.04.05.0%Jun 17Jun 25Jul 2Jul 10Jul 17

Cumulative Flows

-150 M-100 M-50 M0 M50 M100 MJun 17Jun 25Jul 2Jul 10Jul 17

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/17/2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y5Y
Perf.
GRPM
FFSM
+4.99%-0.62%
+6.53%+4.18%
+11.55%+19.73%
+18.54%+32.36%
+46.81%+66.98%
+60.74%+74.82%
Flows
GRPM
FFSM
-$153M+$105M
-$35M+$156M
-$67M+$287M
-$61M+$449M
+$141M+$1.12B
+$236M+$1.13B
Volatility and drawdown
3M1Y3Y5Y
Volatility
GRPM
FFSM
+12.55%+19.03%
+15.78%+18.56%
+19.87%+19.20%
+20.78%+20.62%
Max drawdown
GRPM
FFSM
-2.85%-5.57%
-7.71%-10.43%
-27.87%-24.54%
-27.87%-26.71%
Max drawdown duration
GRPM
FFSM
23d35d
66d43d
421d283d
421d828d
Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free
GRPM
FFSM
Last sale
7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM
$132.90
$36.71
Previous close
07/16/2026
$133.41
$36.87
Consolidated volume
07/16/2026
Average volume
30 days
Average discount or premium
30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread
30 days
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

FFSM
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an index

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free
GRPM
FFSM
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
GRPM
FFSM
Last price
$132.90
$36.71
1D performance
-0.38%
-0.43%
AuM$479.91 M$1.44 B
E/R0.35%0.43%
Characteristics
GRPM
FFSM
Management strategyPassiveActive
ProviderInvescoFidelity
BenchmarkS&P MidCap 400 GARP Index-
N° of holdings58730
Asset classEquities-
Trailing 12m distribution yield
Join
Join
Inception dateDecember 3, 2010February 4, 2021
ESGNoNo
Advertisement
Exposure

Countries

GRPM
USA
92.91%
Other
7.09%
FFSM
USA
94.36%
Other
5.64%

Sectors

GRPM
Finance
32.95%
Energy
13.48%
Technology
12.38%
Healthcare
12.28%
Industrials
7.86%
Other
21.04%
FFSM
Industrials
19.86%
Finance
19.58%
Technology
17.52%
Non-Energy Materi.
9.75%
Healthcare
9.33%
Consumer Cyclical.
7.8%
Other
16.16%
Advertisement

Diversification

GRPM

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

38.54%
FFSM

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

24.64%

Top 15 holdings

Data as of May 31, 2026
GRPM
Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
4.32%
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
3.47%
Rambus, Inc.
3.04%
Carpenter Technology Corp.
2.83%
Valaris Ltd.
2.78%
TechnipFMC plc
2.75%
RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
2.66%
Permian Resources Corp.
2.64%
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
2.25%
East West Bancorp, Inc.
2.16%
Bank OZK
2.10%
NOV, Inc.
1.96%
Visteon Corp.
1.86%
Dynatrace, Inc.
1.86%
UMB Financial Corp.
1.85%
FFSM
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
2.55%
Sanmina Corp.
2.34%
Lumentum Holdings, Inc.
2.03%
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
1.89%
IES Holdings, Inc.
1.88%
Fabrinet
1.72%
ITT, Inc.
1.56%
Murphy USA, Inc.
1.50%
SPX Technologies, Inc.
1.34%
BrightSpring Health Services, Inc.
1.34%
Eagle Materials, Inc.
1.33%
Coherent Corp.
1.31%
Carpenter Technology Corp.
1.30%
Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc.
1.29%
TD SYNNEX Corp.
1.26%
Frequently asked questions about GRPM and FFSM

How have the GRPM and FFSM ETFs performed in 2026?

As of July 17, 2026, GRPM is up 11.55% year-to-date (YTD), while FFSM has returned 19.73%. That puts FFSM better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GRPM or FFSM?

Year-to-date, the GRPM ETF saw -$67M in flows, compared to +$287M for FFSM.

Which ETF is more volatile: GRPM or FFSM?

Over the past year, GRPM had a volatility of 15.78%, while FFSM experienced 18.56%.

Which ETF is bigger: GRPM or FFSM?

As of July 17, 2026, GRPM holds $479.91 M in assets under management (AUM), while FFSM manages $1.44 B.

What sectors do the GRPM and FFSM ETFs invest in?

GRPM leans toward sectors like Finance, Energy and Technology. Meanwhile, FFSM focuses on Industrials, Finance and Technology.

What are the top holdings of the GRPM ETF and FFSM ETF?

GRPM top holdings include Lantheus Holdings, Inc., Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. and Rambus, Inc.. FFSM holds in its top three: Sterling Infrastructure, Inc., Sanmina Corp. and Lumentum Holdings, Inc..

Which ETF is more diversified: GRPM or FFSM?

GRPM holds 58 securities with 38.54% of its assets in the top 15. FFSM has 730 securities and a top 15 weight of 24.64%.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
The Active Trader Report

Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up

Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.

Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up