Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
GRPMvsAFMCETF Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF (GRPM) and First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF (AFMC) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. GRPM's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, AFMC's top sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. GRPM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.65% for AFMC. GRPM is down -0.77% year-to-date (YTD) with -$20M in YTD flows. AFMC performs better with 4.35% YTD performance, and +$35M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GRPM and AFMC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
GRPM vs AFMC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GRPM AFMC | -3.99%-4.30% | -3.92%+1.71% | -0.77%+4.35% | +16.13%+20.28% | +46.74%+65.49% | +40.01%+53.91% |
| Flows | GRPM AFMC | -$27M+$18M | -$22M+$35M | -$20M+$35M | -$114M+$80M | +$217M+$120M | +$304M+$119M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GRPM AFMC | +15.66%+14.63% | +23.43%+19.44% | +20.27%+17.74% | +20.98%+19.48% |
| Max drawdown | GRPM AFMC | -5.16%-5.13% | -16.57%-13.21% | -27.87%-21.83% | -27.87%-25.69% |
| Max drawdown duration | GRPM AFMC | 30d17d | 91d46d | 421d289d | 421d752d |
GRPM | AFMC | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $116.55 | $35.35 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $118.52 | $35.92 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
GRPM | AFMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
GRPM | AFMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $116.55 | $35.35 |
| 1D performance | -1.66% | -1.60% |
| AuM | $474.67 M | $134.68 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.65% |
GRPM | AFMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Invesco | First Trust |
| Benchmark | S&P MidCap 400 GARP Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 57 | 258 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 3, 2010 | December 3, 2019 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the GRPM and AFMC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, GRPM is down -0.77% year-to-date (YTD), while AFMC has returned 4.35%. That puts AFMC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GRPM or AFMC?
Year-to-date, the GRPM ETF saw -$20M in flows, compared to +$35M for AFMC.
Which ETF is more volatile: GRPM or AFMC?
Over the past year, GRPM had a volatility of 23.43%, while AFMC experienced 19.44%.
Which ETF is bigger: GRPM or AFMC?
As of March 11, 2026, GRPM holds $474.67 M in assets under management (AUM), while AFMC manages $134.68 M.
What sectors do the GRPM and AFMC ETFs invest in?
GRPM leans toward sectors like Financials, Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, AFMC focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the GRPM ETF and AFMC ETF?
GRPM top holdings include LANTHEUS HOLDINGS, RENAISSANCERE and APPFOLIO INC. AFMC holds in its top three: MUELLER INDUSTRIES, FEDERATED HERMES and EXELIXIS.
Which ETF is more diversified: GRPM or AFMC?
GRPM holds 60 securities with 33.68% of its assets in the top 15. AFMC has 265 securities and a top 15 weight of 15.32%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
