Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
GRNJvsQMOMETF Comparison
Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF (GRNJ) and Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. GRNJ's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Materials. In contrast, QMOM's top sector exposures are Industrials, Materials and Information Technology. GRNJ is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%, versus 0.29% for QMOM. GRNJ is down -0.92% year-to-date (YTD) with +$197M in YTD flows. QMOM performs better with 4.37% YTD performance, and +$6M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GRNJ and QMOM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
GRNJ vs QMOM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GRNJ QMOM | -6.28%-2.02% | -3.78%+3.61% | -0.92%+4.37% | n/a+19.89% | n/a+61.41% | n/a+31.42% |
| Flows | GRNJ QMOM | +$51M+$2M | +$245M+$7M | +$197M+$6M | -+$19M | -+$150M | -+$182M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GRNJ QMOM | +29.27%+25.60% | n/a+24.79% | n/a+21.78% | n/a+24.65% |
| Max drawdown | GRNJ QMOM | -12.06%-8.04% | n/a-14.73% | n/a-26.41% | n/a-26.41% |
| Max drawdown duration | GRNJ QMOM | 52d10d | n/a50d | n/a414d | n/a414d |
GRNJ | QMOM | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 2:35 PM | $25.44 | $68.21 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $25.28 | $69.79 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
GRNJ | QMOM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $25.44 | $68.21 |
| 1D performance | +0.63% | -2.26% |
| AuM | $370.94 M | $361.67 M |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.29% |
GRNJ | QMOM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Fundstrat | Alpha Architect |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 47 | 47 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 18, 2025 | December 2, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the GRNJ and QMOM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, GRNJ is down -0.92% year-to-date (YTD), while QMOM has returned 4.37%. That puts QMOM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GRNJ or QMOM?
Year-to-date, the GRNJ ETF saw +$197M in flows, compared to +$6M for QMOM.
Which ETF is bigger: GRNJ or QMOM?
As of March 12, 2026, GRNJ holds $370.94 M in assets under management (AUM), while QMOM manages $361.67 M.
What sectors do the GRNJ and QMOM ETFs invest in?
GRNJ leans toward sectors like Industrials, Information Technology and Materials. Meanwhile, QMOM focuses on Industrials, Materials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the GRNJ ETF and QMOM ETF?
GRNJ top holdings include US7731211089, ROYAL GOLD and LUMENTUM HOLDINGS. QMOM holds in its top three: ENERGY FUELS, COEUR MINING INC and GB00BRXH2664.
Which ETF is more diversified: GRNJ or QMOM?
GRNJ holds 51 securities with 36.42% of its assets in the top 15. QMOM has 50 securities and a top 15 weight of 30.45%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
