Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
GQQQvsTMFCETF Comparison
Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF (GQQQ) and Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. GQQQ is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.5% for TMFC. GQQQ is up 1.02% year-to-date (YTD) with +$9M in YTD flows. TMFC performs worse with -3.67% YTD performance, and +$4M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GQQQ and TMFC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
GQQQ vs TMFC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GQQQ TMFC | -1.65%-1.34% | -0.51%-4.36% | +1.02%-3.67% | +29.55%+24.81% | n/a+114.90% | n/a+96.05% |
| Flows | GQQQ TMFC | +$4M-$16M | +$10M+$67M | +$9M+$4M | +$39M+$396M | -+$881M | -+$891M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GQQQ TMFC | +16.41%+13.05% | +21.09%+20.41% | n/a+17.69% | n/a+20.72% |
| Max drawdown | GQQQ TMFC | -4.83%-5.89% | -14.84%-14.13% | n/a-20.32% | n/a-32.87% |
| Max drawdown duration | GQQQ TMFC | 42d73d | 45d37d | n/a110d | n/a718d |
GQQQ | TMFC | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $29.86 | $68.15 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $30.26 | $69.14 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
GQQQ | TMFC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
GQQQ | TMFC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $29.86 | $68.15 |
| 1D performance | -1.32% | -1.43% |
| AuM | $112.28 M | $1.87 B |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.5% |
GQQQ | TMFC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Astoria Portfolio Advisors | Motley Fool Asset Management |
| Benchmark | - | Motley Fool 100 Index |
| N° of holdings | 94 | 96 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 1, 2024 | January 30, 2018 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the GQQQ and TMFC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, GQQQ is up 1.02% year-to-date (YTD), while TMFC has lost -3.67%. That puts GQQQ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GQQQ or TMFC?
Year-to-date, the GQQQ ETF saw +$9M in flows, compared to +$4M for TMFC.
Which ETF is more volatile: GQQQ or TMFC?
Over the past year, GQQQ had a volatility of 21.09%, while TMFC experienced 20.41%.
Which ETF is bigger: GQQQ or TMFC?
As of March 11, 2026, GQQQ holds $112.28 M in assets under management (AUM), while TMFC manages $1.87 B.
What sectors do the GQQQ and TMFC ETFs invest in?
GQQQ leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, TMFC focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the GQQQ ETF and TMFC ETF?
GQQQ top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. TMFC holds in its top three: NVIDIA, ALPHABET INC-CL and APPLE.
Which ETF is more diversified: GQQQ or TMFC?
GQQQ holds 101 securities with 52.38% of its assets in the top 15. TMFC has 100 securities and a top 15 weight of 59.54%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
