Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
GPIXvsXYLGETF Comparison
Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIX) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF (XYLG) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. GPIX's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Financials. In contrast, XYLG's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Both GPIX and XYLG have the same Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%. GPIX is up 0.26% year-to-date (YTD) with +$645M in YTD flows. XYLG performs better with 0.32% YTD performance, and +$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GPIX and XYLG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
GPIX vs XYLG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GPIX XYLG | -1.68%-1.21% | +0.69%+0.63% | +0.26%+0.32% | +21.35%+18.15% | n/a+61.54% | n/a+65.22% |
| Flows | GPIX XYLG | +$232M-$276K | +$857M+$5M | +$645M+$2M | +$2.63B+$1M | -+$8M | -+$64M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GPIX XYLG | +10.25%+9.25% | +16.76%+15.74% | n/a+12.19% | n/a+13.93% |
| Max drawdown | GPIX XYLG | -2.57%-2.31% | -13.14%-12.29% | n/a-17.16% | n/a-21.24% |
| Max drawdown duration | GPIX XYLG | 12d13d | 45d48d | n/a154d | n/a736d |
GPIX | XYLG | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $51.70 | $27.28 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $51.74 | $27.29 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
GPIX | XYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
GPIX | XYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $51.70 | $27.28 |
| 1D performance | -0.08% | -0.04% |
| AuM | $3.24 B | $64.19 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.35% |
GPIX | XYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Goldman Sachs | Global X |
| Benchmark | - | CBOE S&P 500 Half BuyWrite Index |
| N° of holdings | 471 | 479 |
| Asset class | - | Alternative |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 26, 2023 | June 21, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the GPIX and XYLG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 9, 2026, GPIX is up 0.26% year-to-date (YTD), while XYLG has returned 0.32%. That puts XYLG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GPIX or XYLG?
Year-to-date, the GPIX ETF saw +$645M in flows, compared to +$2M for XYLG.
Which ETF is more volatile: GPIX or XYLG?
Over the past year, GPIX had a volatility of 16.76%, while XYLG experienced 15.74%.
Which ETF is bigger: GPIX or XYLG?
As of March 9, 2026, GPIX holds $3.24 B in assets under management (AUM), while XYLG manages $64.19 M.
What sectors do the GPIX and XYLG ETFs invest in?
GPIX leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Financials. Meanwhile, XYLG focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the GPIX ETF and XYLG ETF?
GPIX top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. XYLG holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: GPIX or XYLG?
GPIX holds 494 securities with 45.21% of its assets in the top 15. XYLG has 502 securities and a top 15 weight of 44.33%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
