Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
GPIQvsLRNDETF Comparison
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq 100 Core Premium Income ETF
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq 100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) belongs to the Options Strategies segment. NYLI U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF (LRND) is part of the US Large Cap segment. GPIQ's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, LRND's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Health Care. GPIQ is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.15% for LRND. GPIQ is up 0.25% year-to-date (YTD) with +$595M in YTD flows. LRND performs worse with -3.11% YTD performance, and +$102M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GPIQ and LRND below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
GPIQ vs LRND performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GPIQ LRND | -0.61%-2.30% | -0.64%-3.89% | +0.25%-3.11% | +28.17%+21.00% | n/a+92.12% | n/an/a |
| Flows | GPIQ LRND | +$140M+$54M | +$816M+$159M | +$595M+$102M | +$2.54B+$160M | -+$161M | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GPIQ LRND | +14.25%+15.14% | +20.63%+20.85% | n/a+17.15% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | GPIQ LRND | -4.79%-5.64% | -14.95%-16.04% | n/a-20.97% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | GPIQ LRND | 40d40d | 45d49d | n/a126d | n/an/a |
GPIQ | LRND | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $51.63 | $39.38 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $51.59 | $39.42 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
GPIQ | LRND | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
GPIQ | LRND | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $51.63 | $39.38 |
| 1D performance | +0.08% | -0.10% |
| AuM | $3.09 B | $165.82 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.15% |
GPIQ | LRND | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Goldman Sachs | New York Life Investments |
| Benchmark | - | NYLI U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders Index |
| N° of holdings | 93 | 93 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 26, 2023 | February 8, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the GPIQ and LRND ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 9, 2026, GPIQ is up 0.25% year-to-date (YTD), while LRND has lost -3.11%. That puts GPIQ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GPIQ or LRND?
Year-to-date, the GPIQ ETF saw +$595M in flows, compared to +$102M for LRND.
Which ETF is more volatile: GPIQ or LRND?
Over the past year, GPIQ had a volatility of 20.63%, while LRND experienced 20.85%.
Which ETF is bigger: GPIQ or LRND?
As of March 9, 2026, GPIQ holds $3.09 B in assets under management (AUM), while LRND manages $165.82 M.
What sectors do the GPIQ and LRND ETFs invest in?
GPIQ leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, LRND focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the GPIQ ETF and LRND ETF?
GPIQ top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. LRND holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: GPIQ or LRND?
GPIQ holds 99 securities with 58.81% of its assets in the top 15. LRND has 95 securities and a top 15 weight of 75.02%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
