Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
GPIQvsKNGETF Comparison
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq 100 Core Premium Income ETF
FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq 100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) and FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. GPIQ's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, KNG's top sector exposures are Industrials, Consumer Staples and Financials. GPIQ is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.75% for KNG. GPIQ is up 0.23% year-to-date (YTD) with +$602M in YTD flows. KNG performs better with 3.23% YTD performance, and -$6M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GPIQ and KNG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
GPIQ vs KNG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GPIQ KNG | -0.17%-4.79% | -1.03%+2.76% | +0.23%+3.23% | +28.15%+7.79% | n/a+28.39% | n/a+41.39% |
| Flows | GPIQ KNG | +$137M+$23M | +$822M-$66M | +$602M-$6M | +$2.54B-$200M | -+$2.97B | -+$3.49B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GPIQ KNG | +14.22%+9.96% | +20.59%+13.83% | n/a+11.58% | n/a+13.67% |
| Max drawdown | GPIQ KNG | -4.79%-4.90% | -14.95%-10.63% | n/a-14.26% | n/a-16.57% |
| Max drawdown duration | GPIQ KNG | 41d10d | 45d89d | n/a376d | n/a435d |
GPIQ | KNG | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 4:40 PM | $51.12 | $49.84 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $51.63 | $50.03 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
GPIQ | KNG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
GPIQ | KNG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $51.12 | $49.84 |
| 1D performance | -0.99% | -0.39% |
| AuM | $3.10 B | $3.45 B |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.75% |
GPIQ | KNG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Goldman Sachs | Vest |
| Benchmark | - | Cboe S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index |
| N° of holdings | 93 | 65 |
| Asset class | - | Alternative |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 26, 2023 | March 26, 2018 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the GPIQ and KNG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, GPIQ is up 0.23% year-to-date (YTD), while KNG has returned 3.23%. That puts KNG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GPIQ or KNG?
Year-to-date, the GPIQ ETF saw +$602M in flows, compared to -$6M for KNG.
Which ETF is more volatile: GPIQ or KNG?
Over the past year, GPIQ had a volatility of 20.59%, while KNG experienced 13.83%.
Which ETF is bigger: GPIQ or KNG?
As of March 10, 2026, GPIQ holds $3.10 B in assets under management (AUM), while KNG manages $3.45 B.
What sectors do the GPIQ and KNG ETFs invest in?
GPIQ leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, KNG focuses on Industrials, Consumer Staples and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the GPIQ ETF and KNG ETF?
GPIQ top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. KNG holds in its top three: SYSCO, CH ROBINSON WW and COLGATE-PALMOLIVE CO.
Which ETF is more diversified: GPIQ or KNG?
GPIQ holds 99 securities with 58.81% of its assets in the top 15. KNG has 66 securities and a top 15 weight of 22.79%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
