Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
GNRvsREMXETF Comparison
SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) and VanEck Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. GNR's top 3 sector exposures are Materials, Energy and Consumer Staples. In contrast, REMX's top sector exposures are Materials, GNR is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.4%, versus 0.58% for REMX. GNR is up 18.15% year-to-date (YTD) with +$274M in YTD flows. REMX performs better with 31.47% YTD performance, and +$786M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GNR and REMX below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
GNR vs REMX performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GNR REMX | -0.51%+6.37% | +19.46%+32.65% | +18.15%+31.47% | +45.01%+139.90% | +47.10%+29.69% | +69.47%+36.47% |
| Flows | GNR REMX | +$45M+$183M | +$351M+$881M | +$274M+$786M | +$812M+$1.79B | +$87M+$1.71B | +$1.83B+$1.67B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GNR REMX | +18.85%+44.73% | +16.90%+39.35% | +15.74%+33.20% | +18.19%+34.83% |
| Max drawdown | GNR REMX | -4.57%-15.34% | -14.74%-24.86% | -19.80%-61.47% | -25.18%-72.86% |
| Max drawdown duration | GNR REMX | 9d30d | 82d112d | 457d908d | 758d1437d |
GNR | REMX | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $73.62 | $96.92 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $72.74 | $96.49 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
GNR | REMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
GNR | REMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $73.62 | $96.92 |
| 1D performance | +1.21% | +0.45% |
| AuM | $4.80 B | $2.96 B |
| E/R | 0.4% | 0.58% |
GNR | REMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | SPDR | VanEck |
| Benchmark | S&P Global Natural Resources Index | MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index |
| N° of holdings | 77 | 20 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 13, 2010 | October 27, 2010 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the GNR and REMX ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, GNR is up 18.15% year-to-date (YTD), while REMX has returned 31.47%. That puts REMX better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GNR or REMX?
Year-to-date, the GNR ETF saw +$274M in flows, compared to +$786M for REMX.
Which ETF is more volatile: GNR or REMX?
Over the past year, GNR had a volatility of 16.9%, while REMX experienced 39.35%.
Which ETF is bigger: GNR or REMX?
As of March 11, 2026, GNR holds $4.80 B in assets under management (AUM), while REMX manages $2.96 B.
What sectors do the GNR and REMX ETFs invest in?
GNR leans toward sectors like Materials and Energy. Meanwhile, REMX focuses on Materials.
What are the top holdings of the GNR ETF and REMX ETF?
GNR top holdings include NUTRIEN LTD, EXXON and BHP GROUP LTD. REMX holds in its top three: ALBEMARLE, RARE-EARTH and XIAMEN TUNGST.
Which ETF is more diversified: GNR or REMX?
GNR holds 89 securities with 45.62% of its assets in the top 15. REMX has 24 securities and a top 15 weight of 79.5%.
There’s an ETF for That? Rare Earth Metals
How PFIC Rules Could Trigger a Year-End Shock for Mining ETFs
Donald Trump’s Executive Orders: ETF Bulls and Bears
3 Famous Investment Portfolios (And How to Make Them with ETFs)
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
