GNRvsHAPETF Comparison
ETF 1
GNR
State Street SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF
This fund is part of
Natural Resources
+0.09%
VS
State Street SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) and VanEck Vectors Natural Resources ETF (HAP) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. GNR's top 3 sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Energy and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. In contrast, HAP's top sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Energy and Industrials. GNR is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.4%, versus 0.41% for HAP. GNR is up 29.92% year-to-date (YTD) with +$387M in YTD flows. HAP performs better with 30.82% YTD performance, and +$72M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GNR and HAP below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
GNR vs HAP performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/09/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GNR HAP | +6.47%+6.72% | +12.81%+12.27% | +29.92%+30.82% | +41.50%+45.20% | +58.06%+70.63% | +85.43%+96.90% |
| Flows | GNR HAP | +$86M+$16M | +$35M-$16M | +$387M+$72M | +$668M+$92M | +$389M+$109M | +$1.59B+$158M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GNR HAP | +13.62%+13.96% | +15.03%+15.55% | +15.09%+15.55% | +17.88%+17.81% |
| Max drawdown | GNR HAP | -7.23%-4.93% | -10.66%-9.00% | -19.80%-16.54% | -25.18%-25.54% |
| Max drawdown duration | GNR HAP | 43d35d | 158d97d | 457d251d | 758d1147d |
Trading data
GNR | HAP | |
Last sale 9/10/2026 at 1:30 PM | $78.56 | $77.23 |
| Previous close 09/09/2026 | $79.84 | $78.49 |
| Consolidated volume 09/09/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
GNR | HAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/10/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
GNR | HAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $78.56 | $77.23 |
| 1D performance | -1.60% | -1.61% |
| AuM | $5.34 B | $345.72 M |
| E/R | 0.4% | 0.41% |
Characteristics
GNR | HAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | State Street Investment Management | VanEck |
| Benchmark | S&P Global Natural Resources Index | MarketVector Global Natural Resources Index |
| N° of holdings | 87 | 120 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 13, 2010 | August 29, 2008 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
GNR
USA
30.01%
Canada
17.9%
United Kingdom
9.47%
Australia
8.04%
Other
34.59%
HAP
USA
47.1%
Canada
14.47%
United Kingdom
7.19%
Other
31.24%
Sectors
GNR
Non-Energy Materi.
58.43%
Energy
30.27%
Other
11.3%
HAP
Non-Energy Materi.
38.18%
Energy
31.71%
Industrials
10.92%
Utilities
9.15%
Other
10.03%
Advertisement
Diversification
GNR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
41.69%
HAP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
45.86%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
GNR
BHP Group Ltd.
5.17%
Nutrien Ltd.
4.93%
Shell Plc
4.53%
TotalEnergies SE
3.13%
Corteva, Inc.
2.84%
UPM-Kymmene Oyj
2.79%
Chevron Corp.
2.70%
Newmont Corp.
2.50%
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.
2.20%
BP Plc
2.04%
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.
2.04%
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
1.78%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
1.73%
Glencore Plc
1.70%
Reliance Industries Ltd.
1.62%
HAP
Deere & Co.
5.15%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
5.02%
Chevron Corp.
4.87%
Iberdrola SA
3.99%
NextEra Energy, Inc.
3.83%
Bayer AG
3.81%
Corteva, Inc.
3.35%
BHP Group Ltd.
3.12%
Nutrien Ltd.
2.36%
Shell Plc
2.09%
Rio Tinto Plc
1.82%
TotalEnergies SE
1.76%
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.
1.69%
Newmont Corp.
1.52%
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.
1.48%
Frequently asked questions about GNR and HAP
How have the GNR and HAP ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 9, 2026, GNR is up 29.92% year-to-date (YTD), while HAP has returned 30.82%. That puts HAP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GNR or HAP?
Year-to-date, the GNR ETF saw +$387M in flows, compared to +$72M for HAP.
Which ETF is more volatile: GNR or HAP?
Over the past year, GNR had a volatility of 15.03%, while HAP experienced 15.55%.
Which ETF is bigger: GNR or HAP?
As of September 9, 2026, GNR holds $5.34 B in assets under management (AUM), while HAP manages $345.72 M.
What sectors do the GNR and HAP ETFs invest in?
GNR leans toward sectors like Non-Energy Materials and Energy. Meanwhile, HAP focuses on Non-Energy Materials, Energy and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the GNR ETF and HAP ETF?
GNR top holdings include BHP Group Ltd., Nutrien Ltd. and Shell Plc. HAP holds in its top three: Deere & Co., ExxonMobil Holdings Corp. and Chevron Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: GNR or HAP?
GNR holds 87 securities with 41.69% of its assets in the top 15. HAP has 120 securities and a top 15 weight of 45.86%.
Advertisement
Latest news about GNR & HAP
Advertisement
