GNRvsCGWETF Comparison
ETF 1
GNR
State Street SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF
This fund is part of
Natural Resources
-0.65%
VS
State Street SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) and Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. GNR's top 3 sector exposures are Materials, Energy and Consumer Staples. In contrast, CGW's top sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Materials. GNR is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.4%, versus 0.59% for CGW. GNR is up 18.38% year-to-date (YTD) with +$268M in YTD flows. CGW performs worse with 3.28% YTD performance, and +$26M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GNR and CGW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
GNR vs CGW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 04/28/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GNR CGW | +0.33%+3.51% | +3.96%-0.70% | +18.38%+3.28% | +45.61%+14.13% | +44.36%+37.89% | +67.06%+35.40% |
| Flows | GNR CGW | -$101M-$496K | +$179M+$16M | +$268M+$26M | +$790M+$6M | +$85M-$196M | +$1.77B-$57M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GNR CGW | +18.75%+14.57% | +14.33%+12.27% | +15.41%+13.59% | +18.17%+15.64% |
| Max drawdown | GNR CGW | -7.23%-9.88% | -7.23%-9.88% | -19.80%-15.88% | -25.18%-32.65% |
| Max drawdown duration | GNR CGW | 57d61d | 57d61d | 457d140d | 758d862d |
Trading data
GNR | CGW | |
Last sale 4/29/2026 at 5:22 PM | $73.63 | $64.38 |
| Previous close 04/28/2026 | $73.46 | $65.16 |
| Consolidated volume 04/28/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of March 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
GNR | CGW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 4/29/2026 at 5:22 PM
Live
Closed
GNR | CGW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $73.63 | $64.38 |
| 1D performance | +0.23% | -1.20% |
| AuM | $4.81 B | $1.04 B |
| E/R | 0.4% | 0.59% |
Characteristics
GNR | CGW | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | State Street Investment Management | Invesco |
| Benchmark | S&P Global Natural Resources Index | S&P Global Water Index |
| N° of holdings | 77 | 60 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 13, 2010 | May 14, 2007 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
GNR
USA
37.82%
Canada
19.57%
United Kingdom
11%
Other
31.61%
CGW
USA
58.28%
Brazil
12.68%
United Kingdom
9.99%
Other
19.05%
Sectors
GNR
Materials
45.75%
Energy
35.14%
Other
19.11%
CGW
Utilities
46.97%
Industrials
37.72%
Other
15.31%
Advertisement
Diversification
GNR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
47.1%
CGW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
68.83%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of March 31, 2026
GNR
EXXON
5.51%
SHELL PLC
5.30%
NUTRIEN LTD
5.22%
BHP GROUP LTD
3.97%
TOTALENERGIES SE
3.68%
CHEVRON TEXACO
3.02%
UPM-KYMMENE OY
2.89%
NEWMONT CORP
2.68%
CORTEVA INC
2.62%
BP
2.44%
AGNICO EAGLE MINES LTD
2.31%
CDN NATURAL RESOURCE
1.97%
FREEPORT-MCMORAN INC
1.91%
US7594701077
1.91%
YARA INTL
1.68%
CGW
COMPANHIA DE SANEAMENTO BASICO
9.69%
AMERICAN WATER WORKS
8.77%
XYLEM
6.87%
ESSENTIAL UTILITIES INC
6.06%
US92338C1036
5.18%
UNITED UTILITIES GROUP
4.76%
ECOLAB
3.96%
SEVERN TRENT
3.94%
ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS
3.51%
GEBERIT
3.41%
WTTS WTER TECH
2.91%
PENTAIR PLC
2.57%
CORE & MAIN
2.55%
ZURN WATER SOLUTIONS CORP
2.45%
AMERICAN STATES WATER
2.19%
Frequently asked questions about GNR and CGW
How have the GNR and CGW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of April 28, 2026, GNR is up 18.38% year-to-date (YTD), while CGW has returned 3.28%. That puts GNR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GNR or CGW?
Year-to-date, the GNR ETF saw +$268M in flows, compared to +$26M for CGW.
Which ETF is more volatile: GNR or CGW?
Over the past year, GNR had a volatility of 14.33%, while CGW experienced 12.27%.
Which ETF is bigger: GNR or CGW?
As of April 28, 2026, GNR holds $4.81 B in assets under management (AUM), while CGW manages $1.04 B.
What sectors do the GNR and CGW ETFs invest in?
GNR leans toward sectors like Materials and Energy. Meanwhile, CGW focuses on Utilities and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the GNR ETF and CGW ETF?
GNR top holdings include EXXON, SHELL PLC and NUTRIEN LTD. CGW holds in its top three: COMPANHIA DE SANEAMENTO BASICO, AMERICAN WATER WORKS and XYLEM.
Which ETF is more diversified: GNR or CGW?
GNR holds 89 securities with 47.1% of its assets in the top 15. CGW has 62 securities and a top 15 weight of 68.83%.
Advertisement
Latest news about GNR & CGW
3 Famous Investment Portfolios (And How to Make Them with ETFs)
February 8, 2024
GNR
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Water
January 17, 2024
CGW
Advertisement
Advertisement
