GNRvsCGWETF Comparison
ETF 1
GNR
State Street SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF
This fund is part of
Natural Resources
-0.05%
VS
State Street SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) and Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. GNR's top 3 sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Energy and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. In contrast, CGW's top sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. GNR is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.4%, versus 0.59% for CGW. GNR is up 16.7% year-to-date (YTD) with +$329M in YTD flows. CGW performs worse with 2.83% YTD performance, and +$41M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GNR and CGW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
GNR vs CGW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/24/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GNR CGW | +6.73%+1.17% | -1.79%-1.74% | +16.70%+2.83% | +30.34%+5.61% | +39.93%+29.22% | +64.93%+26.17% |
| Flows | GNR CGW | -$29M+$10M | +$61M-$111M | +$329M+$41M | +$789M+$26M | +$387M-$160M | +$1.60B-$102M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GNR CGW | +14.69%+14.40% | +15.02%+13.15% | +15.14%+13.75% | +17.99%+15.72% |
| Max drawdown | GNR CGW | -10.55%-6.57% | -10.66%-10.52% | -19.80%-15.88% | -25.18%-32.65% |
| Max drawdown duration | GNR CGW | 72d80d | 144d148d | 457d140d | 758d862d |
Trading data
GNR | CGW | |
Last sale 7/27/2026 at 1:30 PM | $71.26 | $64.65 |
| Previous close 07/24/2026 | $71.78 | $64.67 |
| Consolidated volume 07/24/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
GNR | CGW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/27/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
GNR | CGW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $71.26 | $64.65 |
| 1D performance | -0.72% | -0.03% |
| AuM | $4.74 B | $1.05 B |
| E/R | 0.4% | 0.59% |
Characteristics
GNR | CGW | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | State Street Investment Management | Invesco |
| Benchmark | S&P Global Natural Resources Index | S&P Global Water Index |
| N° of holdings | 88 | 67 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 13, 2010 | May 14, 2007 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
GNR
USA
34.78%
Canada
18.26%
United Kingdom
8.8%
Australia
8.29%
Other
29.87%
CGW
USA
59.15%
United Kingdom
11.29%
Brazil
10.57%
Other
18.99%
Sectors
GNR
Non-Energy Materi.
60.3%
Energy
32.77%
Other
6.93%
CGW
Utilities
43.48%
Industrials
36.56%
Non-Energy Materi.
16.18%
Other
3.78%
Advertisement
Diversification
GNR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
44.9%
CGW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
65.66%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
GNR
BHP Group Ltd.
5.37%
Nutrien Ltd.
4.82%
Exxon Mobil Corp.
4.48%
Shell Plc
4.15%
Corteva, Inc.
3.27%
TotalEnergies SE
2.96%
UPM-Kymmene Oyj
2.93%
Newmont Corp.
2.67%
Chevron Corp.
2.44%
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.
2.37%
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.
2.11%
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
2.04%
BP Plc
1.83%
Reliance Industries Ltd.
1.76%
Glencore Plc
1.70%
CGW
American Water Works Co., Inc.
7.85%
Xylem, Inc.
7.34%
Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo SABESP
7.32%
Essential Utilities, Inc.
5.80%
Veralto Corp.
5.33%
Ecolab, Inc.
4.18%
United Utilities Group Plc
4.16%
Severn Trent Plc
3.95%
Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
3.53%
Geberit AG
3.38%
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
3.15%
American States Water Co.
2.63%
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp.
2.41%
California Water Service Group
2.40%
Core & Main, Inc.
2.22%
Frequently asked questions about GNR and CGW
How have the GNR and CGW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 24, 2026, GNR is up 16.7% year-to-date (YTD), while CGW has returned 2.83%. That puts GNR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GNR or CGW?
Year-to-date, the GNR ETF saw +$329M in flows, compared to +$41M for CGW.
Which ETF is more volatile: GNR or CGW?
Over the past year, GNR had a volatility of 15.02%, while CGW experienced 13.15%.
Which ETF is bigger: GNR or CGW?
As of July 24, 2026, GNR holds $4.74 B in assets under management (AUM), while CGW manages $1.05 B.
What sectors do the GNR and CGW ETFs invest in?
GNR leans toward sectors like Non-Energy Materials and Energy. Meanwhile, CGW focuses on Utilities, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials.
What are the top holdings of the GNR ETF and CGW ETF?
GNR top holdings include BHP Group Ltd., Nutrien Ltd. and Exxon Mobil Corp.. CGW holds in its top three: American Water Works Co., Inc., Xylem, Inc. and Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo SABESP.
Which ETF is more diversified: GNR or CGW?
GNR holds 88 securities with 44.9% of its assets in the top 15. CGW has 67 securities and a top 15 weight of 65.66%.
Advertisement
Latest news about GNR & CGW
3 Famous Investment Portfolios (And How to Make Them with ETFs)
February 8, 2024
GNR
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Water
January 17, 2024
CGW
Advertisement
Advertisement
