Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
GNRvsCGWETF Comparison
SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) and Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. GNR's top 3 sector exposures are Materials, Energy and Consumer Staples. In contrast, CGW's top sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Materials. GNR is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.4%, versus 0.59% for CGW. GNR is up 18.15% year-to-date (YTD) with +$274M in YTD flows. CGW performs worse with 2.6% YTD performance, and +$26M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GNR and CGW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
GNR vs CGW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GNR CGW | -0.51%-4.64% | +19.46%+2.21% | +18.15%+2.60% | +45.01%+17.00% | +47.10%+43.05% | +69.47%+44.49% |
| Flows | GNR CGW | +$45M+$5M | +$351M+$26M | +$274M+$26M | +$812M-$2M | +$87M-$196M | +$1.83B-$81M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GNR CGW | +18.85%+11.74% | +16.90%+13.95% | +15.74%+13.42% | +18.19%+15.49% |
| Max drawdown | GNR CGW | -4.57%-6.11% | -14.74%-9.36% | -19.80%-15.88% | -25.18%-32.65% |
| Max drawdown duration | GNR CGW | 9d13d | 82d35d | 457d140d | 758d862d |
GNR | CGW | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $73.65 | $63.85 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $73.62 | $64.46 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
GNR | CGW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
GNR | CGW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $73.65 | $63.85 |
| 1D performance | +0.04% | -0.95% |
| AuM | $4.80 B | $1.03 B |
| E/R | 0.4% | 0.59% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the GNR and CGW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, GNR is up 18.15% year-to-date (YTD), while CGW has returned 2.6%. That puts GNR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GNR or CGW?
Year-to-date, the GNR ETF saw +$274M in flows, compared to +$26M for CGW.
Which ETF is more volatile: GNR or CGW?
Over the past year, GNR had a volatility of 16.9%, while CGW experienced 13.95%.
Which ETF is bigger: GNR or CGW?
As of March 11, 2026, GNR holds $4.80 B in assets under management (AUM), while CGW manages $1.03 B.
What sectors do the GNR and CGW ETFs invest in?
GNR leans toward sectors like Materials and Energy. Meanwhile, CGW focuses on Utilities and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the GNR ETF and CGW ETF?
GNR top holdings include NUTRIEN LTD, EXXON and BHP GROUP LTD. CGW holds in its top three: COMPANHIA DE SANEAMENTO BASICO, XYLEM and AMERICAN WATER WORKS.
Which ETF is more diversified: GNR or CGW?
GNR holds 89 securities with 45.62% of its assets in the top 15. CGW has 62 securities and a top 15 weight of 68.4%.
3 Famous Investment Portfolios (And How to Make Them with ETFs)
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Water
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
