Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
GNOMvsXHSETF Comparison
Global X Genomics & Biotechnology ETF - USD (GNOM) belongs to the BioTech & Genomics segment. SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF (XHS) is part of the US Health Care segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: and Health Care. GNOM is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.5%, versus 0.35% for XHS. GNOM is down -4.2% year-to-date (YTD) with -$2M in YTD flows. XHS performs better with -3.54% YTD performance, and +$6M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GNOM and XHS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
GNOM vs XHS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GNOM XHS | -4.14%-3.48% | -5.72%-5.76% | -4.20%-3.54% | +23.30%+9.47% | -9.06%+24.45% | -52.80%-2.70% |
| Flows | GNOM XHS | --$8M | -$4M+$2M | -$2M+$6M | -$19M-$3M | -$115M-$34M | +$11M-$34M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GNOM XHS | +24.30%+17.81% | +30.21%+19.28% | +28.57%+18.17% | +33.50%+21.14% |
| Max drawdown | GNOM XHS | -13.77%-7.72% | -22.14%-12.54% | -46.50%-17.78% | -72.17%-32.53% |
| Max drawdown duration | GNOM XHS | 49d65d | 113d128d | 1032d362d | 1715d1718d |
GNOM | XHS | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 7:16 PM | $43.93 | $103.05 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $45.00 | $104.90 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
GNOM | XHS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
GNOM | XHS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $43.93 | $103.05 |
| 1D performance | -2.38% | -1.76% |
| AuM | $47.76 M | $85.58 M |
| E/R | 0.5% | 0.35% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the GNOM and XHS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, GNOM is down -4.2% year-to-date (YTD), while XHS has lost -3.54%. That puts XHS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GNOM or XHS?
Year-to-date, the GNOM ETF saw -$2M in flows, compared to +$6M for XHS.
Which ETF is more volatile: GNOM or XHS?
Over the past year, GNOM had a volatility of 30.21%, while XHS experienced 19.28%.
Which ETF is bigger: GNOM or XHS?
As of March 12, 2026, GNOM holds $47.76 M in assets under management (AUM), while XHS manages $85.58 M.
What sectors do the GNOM and XHS ETFs invest in?
GNOM leans toward sectors like Health Care. Meanwhile, XHS focuses on Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the GNOM ETF and XHS ETF?
GNOM top holdings include MODERNA INC, ARROWHEAD PHARMACEUTICALS INC and US74006W2070. XHS holds in its top three: BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING, ALIGNMENT HEALTHCARE and US20603L1026.
Which ETF is more diversified: GNOM or XHS?
GNOM holds 48 securities with 63.95% of its assets in the top 15. XHS has 59 securities and a top 15 weight of 33.22%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
