Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
GLOFvsCRBNETF Comparison
iShares Global Equity Factor ETF (GLOF) and iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF (CRBN) belong to the same industry segment: Global Blended Cap. GLOF's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, CRBN's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Communication Services. Both GLOF and CRBN have the same Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.2%. GLOF is down -0% year-to-date (YTD) with +$14M in YTD flows. CRBN performs worse with -1.55% YTD performance, and +$12M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GLOF and CRBN below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
GLOF vs CRBN performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GLOF CRBN | -3.19%-3.81% | +0.53%-0.78% | -0.00%-1.55% | +24.58%+21.13% | +76.44%+72.35% | +65.93%+60.90% |
| Flows | GLOF CRBN | +$11M- | +$14M+$12M | +$14M+$12M | +$30M-$131M | -$12M-$304M | +$16M-$63M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GLOF CRBN | +12.28%+12.81% | +16.14%+16.59% | +13.47%+13.77% | +15.07%+15.63% |
| Max drawdown | GLOF CRBN | -5.13%-5.72% | -13.04%-13.25% | -16.08%-16.48% | -24.78%-26.92% |
| Max drawdown duration | GLOF CRBN | 15d15d | 37d45d | 85d87d | 708d752d |
GLOF | CRBN | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $52.38 | $225.13 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $52.88 | $226.89 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
GLOF | CRBN | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
GLOF | CRBN | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $52.38 | $225.13 |
| 1D performance | -0.94% | -0.77% |
| AuM | $166.16 M | $986.32 M |
| E/R | 0.2% | 0.2% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the GLOF and CRBN ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, GLOF is down -0% year-to-date (YTD), while CRBN has lost -1.55%. That puts GLOF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GLOF or CRBN?
Year-to-date, the GLOF ETF saw +$14M in flows, compared to +$12M for CRBN.
Which ETF is more volatile: GLOF or CRBN?
Over the past year, GLOF had a volatility of 16.14%, while CRBN experienced 16.59%.
Which ETF is bigger: GLOF or CRBN?
As of March 12, 2026, GLOF holds $166.16 M in assets under management (AUM), while CRBN manages $986.32 M.
What sectors do the GLOF and CRBN ETFs invest in?
GLOF leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, CRBN focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Communication Services.
What are the top holdings of the GLOF ETF and CRBN ETF?
GLOF top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and ALPHABET INC-CL. CRBN holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: GLOF or CRBN?
GLOF holds 646 securities with 27.94% of its assets in the top 15. CRBN has 976 securities and a top 15 weight of 28.1%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
