GLLvsSCOETF Comparison
VS
ProShares UltraShort Gold - USD (GLL) and ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil ETF (SCO) belong to the same industry segment: Inverse Commodity. GLL is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.95%, versus 1.1% for SCO. GLL is up 4.44% year-to-date (YTD) with +$11M in YTD flows. SCO performs worse with -79.61% YTD performance, and +$1.41B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GLL and SCO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
GLL vs SCO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/23/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GLL SCO | +15.31%-21.19% | +2.36%-36.30% | +4.44%-79.61% | -4.88%-77.67% | -75.97%-76.51% | -79.31%-93.67% |
| Flows | GLL SCO | -$7M+$19M | -$24M+$611M | +$11M+$1.41B | -$34M+$1.42B | +$126M+$1.17B | +$108M+$1.38B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GLL SCO | +41.29%+52.51% | +55.70%+63.99% | +42.91%+55.55% | +38.07%+62.44% |
| Max drawdown | GLL SCO | -24.99%-47.88% | -47.90%-80.89% | -86.33%-82.51% | -89.60%-95.30% |
| Max drawdown duration | GLL SCO | 80d79d | 353d311d | 1076d536d | 1488d1787d |
Trading data
GLL | SCO | |
Last sale 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM | $27.05 | $15.92 |
| Previous close 10/22/2026 | $26.66 | $16.54 |
| Consolidated volume 10/22/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 25, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
GLL | SCO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
GLL | SCO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $27.05 | $15.92 |
| 1D performance | +1.46% | -3.75% |
| AuM | $98.66 M | $846.56 M |
| E/R | 0.95% | 1.1% |
Characteristics
GLL | SCO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | ProShares | ProShares |
| Benchmark | Bloomberg Gold Subindex | Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | Commodities | Commodities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 1, 2008 | November 24, 2008 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Exposure data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about GLL and SCO
How have the GLL and SCO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 23, 2026, GLL is up 4.44% year-to-date (YTD), while SCO has lost -79.61%. That puts GLL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GLL or SCO?
Year-to-date, the GLL ETF saw +$11M in flows, compared to +$1.41B for SCO.
Which ETF is more volatile: GLL or SCO?
Over the past year, GLL had a volatility of 55.7%, while SCO experienced 63.99%.
Which ETF is bigger: GLL or SCO?
As of October 23, 2026, GLL holds $98.66 M in assets under management (AUM), while SCO manages $846.56 M.
Advertisement
Advertisement
