Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
GLIXvsPAVEETF Comparison
Lazard Listed Infrastructure ETF (GLIX) and Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) belong to the same industry segment: Infrastructure. GLIX's top 3 sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Real Estate. In contrast, PAVE's top sector exposures are Industrials, Materials and Utilities. GLIX is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.96%, versus 0.47% for PAVE. GLIX is up 9.22% year-to-date (YTD) with +$3M in YTD flows. PAVE performs worse with 5.7% YTD performance, and +$1.05B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GLIX and PAVE below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
GLIX vs PAVE performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GLIX PAVE | +0.93%-7.55% | +9.85%+3.60% | +9.22%+5.70% | n/a+34.26% | n/a+87.24% | n/a+111.71% |
| Flows | GLIX PAVE | +$1M+$473M | +$5M+$1.31B | +$3M+$1.05B | -+$1.28B | -+$3.60B | -+$5.48B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GLIX PAVE | +11.21%+20.32% | n/a+22.76% | n/a+20.38% | n/a+21.81% |
| Max drawdown | GLIX PAVE | -3.79%-9.25% | n/a-14.24% | n/a-26.27% | n/a-26.27% |
| Max drawdown duration | GLIX PAVE | 10d18d | n/a37d | n/a239d | n/a239d |
GLIX | PAVE | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $27.38 | $50.16 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $27.17 | $50.50 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
GLIX | PAVE | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
GLIX | PAVE | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $27.38 | $50.16 |
| 1D performance | +0.75% | -0.67% |
| AuM | $23.07 M | $11.53 B |
| E/R | 0.96% | 0.47% |
GLIX | PAVE | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Lazard Asset Management | Global X |
| Benchmark | - | Indxx U.S. Infrastructure Development Index |
| N° of holdings | 26 | 91 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 3, 2025 | March 6, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the GLIX and PAVE ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, GLIX is up 9.22% year-to-date (YTD), while PAVE has returned 5.7%. That puts GLIX better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GLIX or PAVE?
Year-to-date, the GLIX ETF saw +$3M in flows, compared to +$1.05B for PAVE.
Which ETF is bigger: GLIX or PAVE?
As of March 11, 2026, GLIX holds $23.07 M in assets under management (AUM), while PAVE manages $11.53 B.
What sectors do the GLIX and PAVE ETFs invest in?
GLIX leans toward sectors like Utilities, Industrials and Real Estate. Meanwhile, PAVE focuses on Industrials and Materials.
What are the top holdings of the GLIX ETF and PAVE ETF?
GLIX top holdings include NATIONAL GRID, VINCI and CDN NATL RAILWAY. PAVE holds in its top three: HOWMET AEROSPACE INC, PARKER HANNIFIN and QUANTA SERVICES.
Which ETF is more diversified: GLIX or PAVE?
GLIX holds 27 securities with 75.92% of its assets in the top 15. PAVE has 98 securities and a top 15 weight of 45.12%.
Notable ETF Filings Recap: March 2024
How to Obtain Real Asset Exposure by Investing in Infrastructure ETFs
How US Infrastructure Can Benefit Your Portfolio
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
