Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
GLBLvsUSSGETF Comparison
Pacer MSCI World Industry Advantage ETF (GLBL) belongs to the DM Large & Mid Cap segment. Xtrackers MSCI USA Selection Equity ETF (USSG) is part of the US Large Cap segment. GLBL's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, USSG's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Health Care. GLBL is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.65%, versus 0.09% for USSG. GLBL is down -3.97% year-to-date (YTD) with +$1K in YTD flows. USSG performs better with -1.79% YTD performance, and -$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GLBL and USSG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
GLBL vs USSG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GLBL USSG | -2.20%-2.63% | -3.87%-1.80% | -3.97%-1.79% | +20.87%+25.83% | n/a+85.32% | n/a+85.11% |
| Flows | GLBL USSG | +$1K-$2M | +$1K+$43M | +$1K-$2M | +$1K-$99M | --$3.20B | --$3.48B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GLBL USSG | +12.85%+12.33% | +18.02%+18.28% | n/a+15.50% | n/a+17.32% |
| Max drawdown | GLBL USSG | -6.03%-5.25% | -13.57%-13.43% | n/a-20.08% | n/a-26.89% |
| Max drawdown duration | GLBL USSG | 59d42d | 45d45d | n/a154d | n/a713d |
GLBL | USSG | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $60.99 | |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $61.44 | |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
GLBL | USSG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
GLBL | USSG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $60.99 |
| 1D performance | – | -0.73% |
| AuM | $0.97 M | $536.55 M |
| E/R | 0.65% | 0.09% |
GLBL | USSG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | Xtrackers by DWS |
| Benchmark | MSCI World Ricardo Comparative Advantage Select GDP Tilted Index | MSCI USA Selection Index |
| N° of holdings | 347 | 380 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 16, 2024 | March 7, 2019 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the GLBL and USSG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, GLBL is down -3.97% year-to-date (YTD), while USSG has lost -1.79%. That puts USSG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GLBL or USSG?
Year-to-date, the GLBL ETF saw +$1K in flows, compared to -$2M for USSG.
Which ETF is more volatile: GLBL or USSG?
Over the past year, GLBL had a volatility of 18.02%, while USSG experienced 18.28%.
Which ETF is bigger: GLBL or USSG?
As of March 12, 2026, GLBL holds $0.97 M in assets under management (AUM), while USSG manages $536.55 M.
What sectors do the GLBL and USSG ETFs invest in?
GLBL leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, USSG focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the GLBL ETF and USSG ETF?
GLBL top holdings include ALPHABET INC-CL, AMAZON.COM INC and NVIDIA. USSG holds in its top three: NVIDIA, MICROSOFT-T and ALPHABET INC-CL.
Which ETF is more diversified: GLBL or USSG?
GLBL holds 371 securities with 44.64% of its assets in the top 15. USSG has 399 securities and a top 15 weight of 53.39%.
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.