Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
GINNvsCLSEETF Comparison
Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) belongs to the Disruptive Technology segment. Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) is part of the Alternatives segment. GINN's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, CLSE's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Communication Services. GINN is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.5%, versus 1.44% for CLSE. GINN is down -2.26% year-to-date (YTD) with -$4M in YTD flows. CLSE performs better with 1.52% YTD performance, and +$69M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GINN and CLSE below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
GINN vs CLSE performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GINN CLSE | -2.45%-1.60% | -3.85%+2.75% | -2.26%+1.52% | +21.03%+32.40% | +71.48%+95.51% | +28.28%n/a |
| Flows | GINN CLSE | -+$26M | -$22M+$74M | -$4M+$69M | -$71M+$113M | -$254M+$256M | -$269M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GINN CLSE | +13.62%+13.24% | +18.44%+14.28% | +16.29%+13.01% | +20.17%n/a |
| Max drawdown | GINN CLSE | -6.39%-4.46% | -16.03%-8.49% | -21.86%-15.76% | -40.96%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | GINN CLSE | 58d16d | 46d37d | 127d188d | 1096dn/a |
GINN | CLSE | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $69.75 | $27.75 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $70.02 | $27.88 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
GINN | CLSE | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
GINN | CLSE | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $69.75 | $27.75 |
| 1D performance | -0.39% | -0.47% |
| AuM | $207.52 M | $339.80 M |
| E/R | 0.5% | 1.44% |
GINN | CLSE | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Goldman Sachs | Convergence Investment Partners LLC |
| Benchmark | Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 400 | 624 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 6, 2020 | February 22, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the GINN and CLSE ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, GINN is down -2.26% year-to-date (YTD), while CLSE has returned 1.52%. That puts CLSE better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GINN or CLSE?
Year-to-date, the GINN ETF saw -$4M in flows, compared to +$69M for CLSE.
Which ETF is more volatile: GINN or CLSE?
Over the past year, GINN had a volatility of 18.44%, while CLSE experienced 14.28%.
Which ETF is bigger: GINN or CLSE?
As of March 11, 2026, GINN holds $207.52 M in assets under management (AUM), while CLSE manages $339.80 M.
What sectors do the GINN and CLSE ETFs invest in?
GINN leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, CLSE focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Communication Services.
What are the top holdings of the GINN ETF and CLSE ETF?
GINN top holdings include ALPHABET INC-CL, NVIDIA and AMAZON.COM INC. CLSE holds in its top three: MICRON TECHNOLOGY, NVIDIA and US5128073062.
Which ETF is more diversified: GINN or CLSE?
GINN holds 456 securities with 19.87% of its assets in the top 15. CLSE has 666 securities and a top 15 weight of 36.51%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
