Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
GIIvsEMLPETF Comparison
First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure ETF
SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII) and First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure ETF (EMLP) belong to the same industry segment: Infrastructure. GII's top 3 sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Energy. In contrast, EMLP's top sector exposures are Utilities, Energy and Industrials. GII is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.4%, versus 0.95% for EMLP. GII is up 8.6% year-to-date (YTD) with +$61M in YTD flows. EMLP performs better with 14.53% YTD performance, and +$79M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GII and EMLP below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
GII vs EMLP performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GII EMLP | -0.81%+5.01% | +9.27%+14.56% | +8.60%+14.53% | +30.68%+23.42% | +58.57%+83.77% | +72.93%+125.27% |
| Flows | GII EMLP | +$54M+$63M | +$82M+$100M | +$61M+$79M | +$178M+$196M | +$57M+$71M | +$183M+$381M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GII EMLP | +9.51%+10.15% | +11.10%+13.57% | +11.12%+13.04% | +12.12%+14.61% |
| Max drawdown | GII EMLP | -3.83%-1.89% | -8.02%-11.20% | -14.95%-11.35% | -20.58%-14.41% |
| Max drawdown duration | GII EMLP | 10d8d | 18d106d | 322d177d | 747d329d |
GII | EMLP | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $75.87 | $43.53 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $76.06 | $43.32 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
GII | EMLP | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
GII | EMLP | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $75.87 | $43.53 |
| 1D performance | -0.25% | +0.48% |
| AuM | $799.95 M | $3.95 B |
| E/R | 0.4% | 0.95% |
GII | EMLP | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | SPDR | First Trust |
| Benchmark | S&P Global Infrastructure Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 68 | 60 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 25, 2007 | June 20, 2012 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the GII and EMLP ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, GII is up 8.6% year-to-date (YTD), while EMLP has returned 14.53%. That puts EMLP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GII or EMLP?
Year-to-date, the GII ETF saw +$61M in flows, compared to +$79M for EMLP.
Which ETF is more volatile: GII or EMLP?
Over the past year, GII had a volatility of 11.1%, while EMLP experienced 13.57%.
Which ETF is bigger: GII or EMLP?
As of March 11, 2026, GII holds $799.95 M in assets under management (AUM), while EMLP manages $3.95 B.
What sectors do the GII and EMLP ETFs invest in?
GII leans toward sectors like Utilities, Industrials and Energy. Meanwhile, EMLP focuses on Utilities and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the GII ETF and EMLP ETF?
GII top holdings include ES0105046017, NEXTERA ENERGY and TRANSURBAN GRP REIT. EMLP holds in its top three: ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS UNT, ENERGY TRANSFER LP UNITS and MPLX COMMON UNITS.
Which ETF is more diversified: GII or EMLP?
GII holds 76 securities with 50.43% of its assets in the top 15. EMLP has 61 securities and a top 15 weight of 51.31%.
How to Obtain Real Asset Exposure by Investing in Infrastructure ETFs
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
