GGTLvsCLSEETF Comparison
VS
Gabelli Automation ETF (GGTL) and Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) belong to the same industry segment: Alternatives. GGTL's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Non-Energy Materials and Sovereign. GGTL is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.9%, versus 1.52% for CLSE. GGTL is up 18.66% year-to-date (YTD) with +$6M in YTD flows. CLSE performs better with 23.83% YTD performance, and +$549M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GGTL and CLSE below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
GGTL vs CLSE performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/02/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GGTL CLSE | +1.28%-0.66% | -7.72%-1.08% | +18.66%+23.83% | +22.19%+39.98% | +65.65%+114.99% | n/an/a |
| Flows | GGTL CLSE | +$2M+$72M | +$2M+$293M | +$6M+$549M | +$6M+$593M | +$6M+$736M | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GGTL CLSE | +32.86%+11.57% | +22.21%+13.40% | +19.38%+13.56% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | GGTL CLSE | -17.98%-3.69% | -17.98%-4.60% | -21.31%-15.76% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | GGTL CLSE | 72d72d | 72d40d | 212d188d | n/an/a |
Trading data
GGTL | CLSE | |
Last sale 9/2/2026 at 1:30 PM | $37.99 | $33.87 |
| Previous close 09/02/2026 | $37.81 | $33.59 |
| Consolidated volume 09/02/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/2/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
GGTL | CLSE | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $37.99 | $33.87 |
| 1D performance | +0.47% | +0.83% |
| AuM | $14.78 M | $909.93 M |
| E/R | 0.9% | 1.52% |
Characteristics
GGTL | CLSE | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Gabelli Funds | Convergence Investment Partners LLC |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 69 | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 5, 2022 | February 22, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
GGTL
USA
49.19%
Japan
28.91%
Taiwan
13.73%
Other
8.17%
CLSE
Data will be available soon
Sectors
GGTL
Technology
82.52%
Other
17.48%
CLSE
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
GGTL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
49.98%
CLSE
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
GGTL
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
8.60%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
4.64%
Sony Group Corp.
4.06%
Oracle Corp.
3.81%
Broadcom Inc.
3.70%
Arista Networks, Inc.
3.40%
USA, Bills 0% 24sep2026, USD (182D)
3.27%
Renesas Electronics Corp.
2.60%
NVIDIA Corp.
2.58%
Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
2.55%
Texas Instruments Incorporated
2.47%
Fortinet, Inc.
2.20%
Microsoft Corp.
2.14%
Advantest Corp.
2.09%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.87%
CLSE
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about GGTL and CLSE
How have the GGTL and CLSE ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 2, 2026, GGTL is up 18.66% year-to-date (YTD), while CLSE has returned 23.83%. That puts CLSE better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GGTL or CLSE?
Year-to-date, the GGTL ETF saw +$6M in flows, compared to +$549M for CLSE.
Which ETF is more volatile: GGTL or CLSE?
Over the past year, GGTL had a volatility of 22.21%, while CLSE experienced 13.4%.
Which ETF is bigger: GGTL or CLSE?
As of September 2, 2026, GGTL holds $14.78 M in assets under management (AUM), while CLSE manages $909.93 M.
Advertisement
Advertisement
