Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
GGRWvsWINNETF Comparison
Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF (GGRW) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF (WINN) is part of the US Large Cap Growth segment. GGRW's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Industrials. In contrast, WINN's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. GGRW is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.9%, versus 0.57% for WINN. GGRW is down -4.5% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. WINN performs worse with -7.05% YTD performance, and -$15M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GGRW and WINN below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
GGRW vs WINN performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GGRW WINN | -1.50%-1.37% | -3.95%-6.26% | -4.50%-7.05% | +16.79%+14.92% | +105.15%+88.57% | +49.44%n/a |
| Flows | GGRW WINN | -+$826K | --$7M | --$15M | +$1M+$209M | +$2M+$674M | +$3M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GGRW WINN | +15.54%+16.40% | +19.63%+22.69% | +18.98%+20.09% | +25.54%n/a |
| Max drawdown | GGRW WINN | -7.11%-9.39% | -13.07%-15.74% | -20.31%-23.86% | -50.31%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | GGRW WINN | 63d78d | 37d37d | 151d128d | 1057dn/a |
GGRW | WINN | |
Last sale 3/18/2026 at 1:30 PM | $33.37 | $28.54 |
| Previous close 03/17/2026 | $33.70 | $28.92 |
| Consolidated volume 03/17/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
GGRW | WINN | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $33.37 | $28.54 |
| 1D performance | -0.98% | -1.31% |
| AuM | $7.74 M | $995.26 M |
| E/R | 0.9% | 0.57% |
GGRW | WINN | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Gabelli Funds | Harbor Capital |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 37 | 60 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 16, 2021 | February 2, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the GGRW and WINN ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 16, 2026, GGRW is down -4.5% year-to-date (YTD), while WINN has lost -7.05%. That puts GGRW better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GGRW or WINN?
Year-to-date, the GGRW ETF saw - in flows, compared to -$15M for WINN.
Which ETF is more volatile: GGRW or WINN?
Over the past year, GGRW had a volatility of 19.63%, while WINN experienced 22.69%.
Which ETF is bigger: GGRW or WINN?
As of March 16, 2026, GGRW holds $7.74 M in assets under management (AUM), while WINN manages $995.26 M.
What sectors do the GGRW and WINN ETFs invest in?
GGRW leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Industrials. Meanwhile, WINN focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the GGRW ETF and WINN ETF?
GGRW top holdings include NVIDIA, ALPHABET INC-CL and AMAZON.COM INC. WINN holds in its top three: NVIDIA, MICROSOFT-T and APPLE.
Which ETF is more diversified: GGRW or WINN?
GGRW holds 42 securities with 64.37% of its assets in the top 15. WINN has 63 securities and a top 15 weight of 68.17%.
Bigger Isn’t Always Better Part I: 3 “Boutique” ETF Issuers to Watch
2 Active U.S. Equity ETFs That Beat Their Benchmarks in 2023
Harbor Capital Advisors transfers three ETFs to the NYSE trading floor
New funds tackling stagflation, bond sectors and high growth stocks!
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
