Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
GGRWvsRNDETF Comparison
Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF (GGRW) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. First Trust Bloomberg R&D Leaders ETF (RND) is part of the US Large Cap segment. GGRW's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Industrials. In contrast, RND's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Health Care and Communication Services. GGRW is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.9%, versus 0.6% for RND. GGRW is down -2.71% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. RND performs worse with -4.54% YTD performance, and -$1K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GGRW and RND below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
GGRW vs RND performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GGRW RND | -0.59%-0.92% | -4.31%-5.41% | -2.71%-4.54% | +23.34%+27.50% | +122.52%n/a | +57.18%n/a |
| Flows | GGRW RND | -- | --$1K | --$1K | +$1M+$2M | +$2M- | +$3M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GGRW RND | +15.04%+14.96% | +19.70%+22.84% | +19.05%n/a | +25.58%n/a |
| Max drawdown | GGRW RND | -6.42%-7.31% | -13.07%-16.24% | -20.31%n/a | -50.31%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | GGRW RND | 90d62d | 37d45d | 151dn/a | 1057dn/a |
GGRW | RND | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $34.20 | $29.02 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $34.26 | $28.98 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
GGRW | RND | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
GGRW | RND | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $34.20 | $29.02 |
| 1D performance | -0.16% | +0.16% |
| AuM | $7.88 M | $4.35 M |
| E/R | 0.9% | 0.6% |
GGRW | RND | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Gabelli Funds | First Trust |
| Benchmark | - | Bloomberg R&D Leaders Select Index |
| N° of holdings | 37 | 48 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 16, 2021 | May 1, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the GGRW and RND ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, GGRW is down -2.71% year-to-date (YTD), while RND has lost -4.54%. That puts GGRW better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GGRW or RND?
Year-to-date, the GGRW ETF saw - in flows, compared to -$1K for RND.
Which ETF is more volatile: GGRW or RND?
Over the past year, GGRW had a volatility of 19.7%, while RND experienced 22.84%.
Which ETF is bigger: GGRW or RND?
As of March 10, 2026, GGRW holds $7.88 M in assets under management (AUM), while RND manages $4.35 M.
What sectors do the GGRW and RND ETFs invest in?
GGRW leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Industrials. Meanwhile, RND focuses on Information Technology, Health Care and Communication Services.
What are the top holdings of the GGRW ETF and RND ETF?
GGRW top holdings include NVIDIA, ALPHABET INC-CL and AMAZON.COM INC. RND holds in its top three: ALPHABET INC-CL, AMAZON.COM INC and NVIDIA.
Which ETF is more diversified: GGRW or RND?
GGRW holds 42 securities with 64.37% of its assets in the top 15. RND has 50 securities and a top 15 weight of 73.86%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
