Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
GGRWvsMFSGETF Comparison
Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF (GGRW) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. MFS Active Growth ETF (MFSG) is part of the US Large Cap Growth segment. GGRW's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Industrials. In contrast, MFSG's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. GGRW is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.9%, versus 0.49% for MFSG. GGRW is down -2.68% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. MFSG performs worse with -4.74% YTD performance, and +$67M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GGRW and MFSG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
GGRW vs MFSG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GGRW MFSG | -0.87%-2.64% | -3.39%-5.24% | -2.68%-4.74% | +23.38%+18.99% | +117.52%n/a | +56.66%n/a |
| Flows | GGRW MFSG | -+$50M | -+$83M | -+$67M | +$1M+$182M | +$2M- | +$3M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GGRW MFSG | +15.18%+16.96% | +19.74%+21.88% | +19.10%n/a | +25.58%n/a |
| Max drawdown | GGRW MFSG | -6.42%-7.56% | -13.07%-14.82% | -20.31%n/a | -50.31%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | GGRW MFSG | 89d62d | 37d45d | 151dn/a | 1057dn/a |
GGRW | MFSG | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $34.20 | $26.89 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $34.26 | $26.92 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
GGRW | MFSG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $34.20 | $26.89 |
| 1D performance | -0.16% | -0.12% |
| AuM | $7.89 M | $234.29 M |
| E/R | 0.9% | 0.49% |
GGRW | MFSG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Gabelli Funds | MFS |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 37 | 45 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 16, 2021 | December 4, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the GGRW and MFSG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 9, 2026, GGRW is down -2.68% year-to-date (YTD), while MFSG has lost -4.74%. That puts GGRW better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GGRW or MFSG?
Year-to-date, the GGRW ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$67M for MFSG.
Which ETF is more volatile: GGRW or MFSG?
Over the past year, GGRW had a volatility of 19.74%, while MFSG experienced 21.88%.
Which ETF is bigger: GGRW or MFSG?
As of March 9, 2026, GGRW holds $7.89 M in assets under management (AUM), while MFSG manages $234.29 M.
What sectors do the GGRW and MFSG ETFs invest in?
GGRW leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Industrials. Meanwhile, MFSG focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the GGRW ETF and MFSG ETF?
GGRW top holdings include NVIDIA, ALPHABET INC-CL and AMAZON.COM INC. MFSG holds in its top three: NVIDIA, MICROSOFT-T and ALPHABET INC-CL.
Which ETF is more diversified: GGRW or MFSG?
GGRW holds 42 securities with 64.37% of its assets in the top 15. MFSG has 48 securities and a top 15 weight of 70.09%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
