GGRWvsFMAGETF Comparison
VS
Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF (GGRW) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Fidelity Magellan ETF (FMAG) is part of the Uncategorized Equities segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Industrials and Finance. GGRW is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.9%, versus 0.57% for FMAG. GGRW is up 6.07% year-to-date (YTD) with -$396K in YTD flows. FMAG performs worse with 5.01% YTD performance, and -$33M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GGRW and FMAG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
GGRW vs FMAG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 08/31/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GGRW FMAG | +1.43%-0.11% | -1.20%-2.97% | +6.07%+5.01% | +11.02%+3.95% | +91.97%+60.68% | +38.54%+51.03% |
| Flows | GGRW FMAG | --$5M | -$369K-$10M | -$396K-$33M | -$38K-$38M | +$2M+$134M | +$2M+$148M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GGRW FMAG | +19.41%+20.29% | +16.83%+16.57% | +19.21%+17.98% | +25.56%+20.17% |
| Max drawdown | GGRW FMAG | -7.31%-7.85% | -13.16%-13.95% | -20.31%-20.04% | -50.31%-32.85% |
| Max drawdown duration | GGRW FMAG | 34d62d | 174d174d | 151d131d | 1057d796d |
Trading data
GGRW | FMAG | |
Last sale 8/31/2026 at 1:30 PM | $37.39 | $35.43 |
| Previous close 08/31/2026 | $37.55 | $35.96 |
| Consolidated volume 08/31/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 8/31/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
GGRW | FMAG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $37.39 | $35.43 |
| 1D performance | -0.42% | -1.49% |
| AuM | $8.22 M | $242.28 M |
| E/R | 0.9% | 0.57% |
Characteristics
GGRW | FMAG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Gabelli Funds | Fidelity |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 42 | 499 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 16, 2021 | February 4, 2021 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
GGRW
USA
91.69%
Other
8.31%
FMAG
USA
93.73%
Other
6.27%
Sectors
GGRW
Technology
51.77%
Industrials
15.64%
Finance
8.79%
Healthcare
8.41%
Other
15.39%
FMAG
Technology
55.45%
Industrials
11.49%
Finance
8.16%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.72%
Other
17.17%
Advertisement
Diversification
GGRW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
63.65%
FMAG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
57.97%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
GGRW
NVIDIA Corp.
8.72%
Alphabet, Inc.
6.11%
Amazon.com, Inc.
5.60%
Broadcom Inc.
4.33%
Eli Lilly & Co.
4.27%
Microsoft Corp.
4.02%
GE Vernova, Inc.
4.01%
Applied Materials, Inc.
3.91%
Apple, Inc.
3.90%
GE Aerospace
3.59%
Mastercard, Inc.
3.58%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
3.31%
Amphenol Corp.
3.25%
ASML Holding NV
2.57%
Stryker Corp.
2.48%
FMAG
NVIDIA Corp.
13.03%
Amazon.com, Inc.
6.62%
Broadcom Inc.
6.00%
Microsoft Corp.
6.00%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
3.76%
KLA Corp.
3.04%
Visa, Inc.
3.03%
Mastercard, Inc.
2.54%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.54%
Amphenol Corp.
2.01%
Motorola Solutions, Inc.
1.96%
TransDigm Group, Inc.
1.91%
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
1.89%
Linde Plc
1.87%
Trane Technologies Plc
1.77%
Frequently asked questions about GGRW and FMAG
How have the GGRW and FMAG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of August 31, 2026, GGRW is up 6.07% year-to-date (YTD), while FMAG has returned 5.01%. That puts GGRW better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GGRW or FMAG?
Year-to-date, the GGRW ETF saw -$396K in flows, compared to -$33M for FMAG.
Which ETF is more volatile: GGRW or FMAG?
Over the past year, GGRW had a volatility of 16.83%, while FMAG experienced 16.57%.
Which ETF is bigger: GGRW or FMAG?
As of August 31, 2026, GGRW holds $8.22 M in assets under management (AUM), while FMAG manages $242.28 M.
What sectors do the GGRW and FMAG ETFs invest in?
GGRW leans toward sectors like Technology, Industrials and Finance. Meanwhile, FMAG focuses on Technology, Industrials and Finance.
What are the top holdings of the GGRW ETF and FMAG ETF?
GGRW top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Alphabet, Inc. and Amazon.com, Inc.. FMAG holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Amazon.com, Inc. and Broadcom Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: GGRW or FMAG?
GGRW holds 42 securities with 63.65% of its assets in the top 15. FMAG has 508 securities and a top 15 weight of 57.97%.
Advertisement
Latest news about GGRW & FMAG
Advertisement
