Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
GGRWvsCAMLETF Comparison
Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF (GGRW) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Congress Large Cap Growth ETF (CAML) is part of the US Large Cap Growth segment. GGRW's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Industrials. In contrast, CAML's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Health Care and Industrials. GGRW is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.9%, versus 0.65% for CAML. GGRW is down -2.91% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. CAML performs worse with -6.37% YTD performance, and +$14M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GGRW and CAML below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
GGRW vs CAML performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GGRW CAML | -0.83%-3.76% | -4.12%-5.77% | -2.91%-6.37% | +22.26%+14.35% | +120.91%n/a | +51.26%n/a |
| Flows | GGRW CAML | -+$11M | -+$16M | -+$14M | +$1M+$48M | +$2M- | +$3M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GGRW CAML | +15.02%+14.39% | +19.69%+20.15% | +19.05%n/a | +25.53%n/a |
| Max drawdown | GGRW CAML | -6.30%-7.99% | -13.07%-14.31% | -20.31%n/a | -50.31%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | GGRW CAML | 58d66d | 37d37d | 151dn/a | 1057dn/a |
GGRW | CAML | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $33.23 | $35.76 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $33.51 | $36.11 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
GGRW | CAML | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $33.23 | $35.76 |
| 1D performance | -0.85% | -0.97% |
| AuM | $7.87 M | $330.07 M |
| E/R | 0.9% | 0.65% |
GGRW | CAML | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Gabelli Funds | Congress Asset Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 37 | 36 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 16, 2021 | August 22, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the GGRW and CAML ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, GGRW is down -2.91% year-to-date (YTD), while CAML has lost -6.37%. That puts GGRW better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GGRW or CAML?
Year-to-date, the GGRW ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$14M for CAML.
Which ETF is more volatile: GGRW or CAML?
Over the past year, GGRW had a volatility of 19.69%, while CAML experienced 20.15%.
Which ETF is bigger: GGRW or CAML?
As of March 11, 2026, GGRW holds $7.87 M in assets under management (AUM), while CAML manages $330.07 M.
What sectors do the GGRW and CAML ETFs invest in?
GGRW leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Industrials. Meanwhile, CAML focuses on Information Technology, Health Care and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the GGRW ETF and CAML ETF?
GGRW top holdings include NVIDIA, ALPHABET INC-CL and AMAZON.COM INC. CAML holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and ALPHABET INC-CL.
Which ETF is more diversified: GGRW or CAML?
GGRW holds 42 securities with 64.37% of its assets in the top 15. CAML has 38 securities and a top 15 weight of 53.78%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
