GEMEvsLDEMETF Comparison
VS
Pacific NoS Global EM Equity Active ETF (GEME) and iShares ESG MSCI EM Leaders ETF (LDEM) belong to the same industry segment: EM Large & Mid Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Finance, Technology and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. GEME is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%, versus 0.16% for LDEM. GEME is up 19.48% year-to-date (YTD) with +$366M in YTD flows. LDEM performs worse with -1.78% YTD performance, and - in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GEME and LDEM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
GEME vs LDEM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/26/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GEME LDEM | -8.41%-6.65% | -8.58%-3.32% | +19.48%-1.78% | +22.53%-3.36% | n/a+51.97% | n/a+5.54% |
| Flows | GEME LDEM | +$6M- | +$110M- | +$366M- | +$371M- | --$25M | --$771M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GEME LDEM | +20.13%+16.15% | +23.21%+18.05% | n/a+15.74% | n/a+17.05% |
| Max drawdown | GEME LDEM | -11.78%-9.28% | -15.60%-12.07% | n/a-14.33% | n/a-36.11% |
| Max drawdown duration | GEME LDEM | 64d34d | 146d243d | n/a219d | n/a1365d |
Trading data
GEME | LDEM | |
Last sale 10/27/2026 at 1:30 PM | $38.62 | $57.30 |
| Previous close 10/26/2026 | $38.08 | $56.82 |
| Consolidated volume 10/26/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
GEME
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexGEME | LDEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/27/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
GEME | LDEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $38.62 | $57.30 |
| 1D performance | +1.44% | +0.85% |
| AuM | $440.49 M | $31.26 M |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.16% |
Characteristics
GEME | LDEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Pacific Asset Management | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | MSCI EM Extended ESG Leaders 5% Issuer Capped Index |
| N° of holdings | 44 | 403 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 22, 2025 | February 5, 2020 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
GEME
China
21.18%
Taiwan
20.87%
Republic of Korea
19.41%
Other
38.55%
LDEM
China
28.62%
Republic of Korea
16.01%
Taiwan
15.86%
India
9.97%
Other
29.54%
Sectors
GEME
Finance
29.45%
Technology
28.1%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.84%
Industrials
10.21%
Consumer Cyclical.
7.65%
Other
13.76%
LDEM
Finance
29.27%
Technology
26.62%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
9.24%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.08%
Other
27.79%
Advertisement
Diversification
GEME
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
55.53%
LDEM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
34.84%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
GEME
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
11.19%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
6.47%
SK Square Co. Ltd.
4.41%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
4.11%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
3.74%
ICICI Bank Ltd.
3.48%
SK, Inc.
3.25%
JD.com, Inc.
3.14%
YPF SA
2.94%
Kia Corp.
2.48%
Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd.
2.17%
CP All Public Co. Ltd.
2.10%
Naspers Ltd.
2.07%
PKO Bank Polski SA
2.00%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
1.97%
LDEM
SK hynix, Inc.
5.55%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
5.12%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
4.94%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
4.48%
Delta Electronics, Inc.
2.37%
China Construction Bank Corp.
2.11%
Reliance Industries Ltd.
1.60%
SK Square Co. Ltd.
1.45%
Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd.
1.30%
Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd.
1.23%
Meituan
1.05%
United Microelectronics Corp.
0.96%
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.
0.91%
NetEase, Inc.
0.89%
KB Financial Group, Inc.
0.88%
Frequently asked questions about GEME and LDEM
How have the GEME and LDEM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 26, 2026, GEME is up 19.48% year-to-date (YTD), while LDEM has lost -1.78%. That puts GEME better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GEME or LDEM?
Year-to-date, the GEME ETF saw +$366M in flows, compared to - for LDEM.
Which ETF is more volatile: GEME or LDEM?
Over the past year, GEME had a volatility of 23.21%, while LDEM experienced 18.05%.
Which ETF is bigger: GEME or LDEM?
As of October 26, 2026, GEME holds $440.49 M in assets under management (AUM), while LDEM manages $31.26 M.
What sectors do the GEME and LDEM ETFs invest in?
GEME leans toward sectors like Finance, Technology and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. Meanwhile, LDEM focuses on Finance, Technology and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
What are the top holdings of the GEME ETF and LDEM ETF?
GEME top holdings include Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and SK Square Co. Ltd.. LDEM holds in its top three: SK hynix, Inc., Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. and Tencent Holdings Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: GEME or LDEM?
GEME holds 48 securities with 55.53% of its assets in the top 15. LDEM has 426 securities and a top 15 weight of 34.84%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
