GEMvsEMGFETF Comparison
ETF 1
GEM
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF
This fund is part of
EM Large & Mid Cap
+1.56%
VS
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GEM) and iShares Emerging Markets Equity Factor ETF (EMGF) belong to the same industry segment: EM Large & Mid Cap. GEM's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Non-Energy Materials. In contrast, EMGF's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. GEM is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.59%, versus 0.26% for EMGF. GEM is up 14.3% year-to-date (YTD) with +$312M in YTD flows. EMGF performs better with 17.22% YTD performance, and +$305M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GEM and EMGF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
GEM vs EMGF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/27/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GEM EMGF | -7.31%-6.31% | -3.22%-1.23% | +14.30%+17.22% | +14.75%+16.89% | +79.06%+90.64% | +40.43%+55.51% |
| Flows | GEM EMGF | +$28M+$13M | +$52M+$42M | +$312M+$305M | +$343M+$356M | +$224M+$756M | +$93M+$798M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GEM EMGF | +21.14%+20.61% | +23.27%+23.10% | +17.58%+17.68% | +16.78%+16.88% |
| Max drawdown | GEM EMGF | -10.29%-10.70% | -13.50%-14.42% | -14.73%-16.15% | -30.83%-26.61% |
| Max drawdown duration | GEM EMGF | 48d35d | 57d127d | 223d220d | 993d902d |
Trading data
GEM | EMGF | |
Last sale 10/28/2026 at 1:30 PM | $48.58 | $68.19 |
| Previous close 10/27/2026 | $47.92 | $67.28 |
| Consolidated volume 10/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
GEM | EMGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/28/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
GEM | EMGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $48.58 | $68.19 |
| 1D performance | +1.38% | +1.35% |
| AuM | $1.67 B | $1.83 B |
| E/R | 0.59% | 0.26% |
Characteristics
GEM | EMGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Goldman Sachs | iShares |
| Benchmark | Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity Index | STOXX Emerging Markets Equity Factor Index |
| N° of holdings | 697 | 654 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 25, 2015 | December 8, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
GEM
Taiwan
24.08%
Republic of Korea
18.43%
China
17.83%
India
9.88%
Other
29.78%
EMGF
Taiwan
25.59%
China
20.53%
Republic of Korea
20.45%
India
12.33%
Other
21.1%
Sectors
GEM
Technology
40.28%
Finance
19.88%
Other
39.85%
EMGF
Technology
41.04%
Finance
21.08%
Industrials
7.52%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.08%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.05%
Other
16.23%
Advertisement
Diversification
GEM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
35.49%
EMGF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
34.22%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
GEM
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
13.94%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
6.54%
SK hynix, Inc.
4.36%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
2.59%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
1.68%
MediaTek, Inc.
1.32%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
0.84%
China Construction Bank Corp.
0.74%
Delta Electronics, Inc.
0.67%
US46434G8143
0.53%
ICICI Bank Ltd.
0.47%
Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd.
0.47%
HDFC Bank Ltd.
0.47%
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd.
0.46%
King Slide Works Co., Ltd.
0.39%
EMGF
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
10.31%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
6.80%
SK hynix, Inc.
4.51%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
2.72%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
1.96%
MediaTek, Inc.
1.50%
China Construction Bank Corp.
1.02%
Delta Electronics, Inc.
1.00%
Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd.
0.76%
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd.
0.66%
SK Square Co. Ltd.
0.65%
Bank of China Ltd.
0.62%
ICICI Bank Ltd.
0.61%
PDD Holdings, Inc.
0.56%
Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd.
0.55%
Frequently asked questions about GEM and EMGF
How have the GEM and EMGF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 27, 2026, GEM is up 14.3% year-to-date (YTD), while EMGF has returned 17.22%. That puts EMGF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GEM or EMGF?
Year-to-date, the GEM ETF saw +$312M in flows, compared to +$305M for EMGF.
Which ETF is more volatile: GEM or EMGF?
Over the past year, GEM had a volatility of 23.27%, while EMGF experienced 23.1%.
Which ETF is bigger: GEM or EMGF?
As of October 27, 2026, GEM holds $1.67 B in assets under management (AUM), while EMGF manages $1.83 B.
What sectors do the GEM and EMGF ETFs invest in?
GEM leans toward sectors like Technology and Finance. Meanwhile, EMGF focuses on Technology, Finance and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the GEM ETF and EMGF ETF?
GEM top holdings include Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and SK hynix, Inc.. EMGF holds in its top three: Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and SK hynix, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: GEM or EMGF?
GEM holds 740 securities with 35.49% of its assets in the top 15. EMGF has 671 securities and a top 15 weight of 34.22%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
