GCCvsBCIETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
BCI
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF
This fund is part of
Multi-Commodity
+0.19%
WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund (GCC) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) belong to the same industry segment: Multi-Commodity. GCC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.58%, versus 0.26% for BCI. GCC is up 23.73% year-to-date (YTD) with +$63M in YTD flows. BCI performs better with 32.38% YTD performance, and +$1.02B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GCC and BCI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
GCC vs BCI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/30/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GCC BCI | -1.80%+0.40% | +7.88%+7.79% | +23.73%+32.38% | +28.73%+36.69% | +66.38%+52.55% | +69.15%+61.53% |
| Flows | GCC BCI | -$40M+$52M | -$3M+$257M | +$63M+$1.02B | +$80M+$1.16B | +$42M+$2.04B | +$78M+$2.35B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GCC BCI | +10.55%+11.72% | +16.67%+17.95% | +13.68%+14.50% | +15.66%+16.45% |
| Max drawdown | GCC BCI | -3.78%-3.87% | -15.32%-14.33% | -15.32%-14.33% | -25.60%-26.07% |
| Max drawdown duration | GCC BCI | 40d44d | 99d105d | 99d105d | 1297d1323d |
Trading data
GCC | BCI | |
Last sale 10/30/2026 at 1:30 PM | $19.76 | $25.74 |
| Previous close 10/29/2026 | $20.05 | $25.93 |
| Consolidated volume 10/29/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 29, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
GCC
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexGCC | BCI | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/30/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
GCC | BCI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $19.76 | $25.74 |
| 1D performance | -1.45% | -0.73% |
| AuM | $209.50 M | $3.47 B |
| E/R | 0.58% | 0.26% |
Characteristics
GCC | BCI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | WisdomTree | abrdn |
| Benchmark | - | Bloomberg Commodity Index |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | Commodities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 24, 2008 | March 30, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
GCC
Data will be available soon
BCI
Data will be available soon
Sectors
GCC
Data will be available soon
BCI
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
GCC
Data will be available soon
BCI
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
GCC
Data will be available soon
BCI
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about GCC and BCI
How have the GCC and BCI ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 30, 2026, GCC is up 23.73% year-to-date (YTD), while BCI has returned 32.38%. That puts BCI better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GCC or BCI?
Year-to-date, the GCC ETF saw +$63M in flows, compared to +$1.02B for BCI.
Which ETF is more volatile: GCC or BCI?
Over the past year, GCC had a volatility of 16.67%, while BCI experienced 17.95%.
Which ETF is bigger: GCC or BCI?
As of October 30, 2026, GCC holds $209.50 M in assets under management (AUM), while BCI manages $3.47 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about GCC & BCI
Advertisement
