New

Turn ETF ideas into real portfolios. Try the builder now →

Advertisement

GBILvsBAMUETF Comparison

ETF 1
GBIL

Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF

This fund is part of
Money Market Bonds
+0%
VS
ETF 2
BAMU

Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF

This fund is part of
US Aggregate Bonds
-0.11%

Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL) belongs to the Money Market Bonds segment. Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU) is part of the US Aggregate Bonds segment. GBIL's top 1 sector exposures are Sovereign. In contrast, BAMU's top sector exposures are Sovereign and Non-Corporate. GBIL is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.14%, versus 1.02% for BAMU. GBIL is up 2.4% year-to-date (YTD) with +$1.10B in YTD flows. BAMU performs worse with 1.78% YTD performance, and -$5M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GBIL and BAMU below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios.  Discover our library of Model portfolios

GBIL vs BAMU performance and flow charts

Performance

0.00.10.10.10.20.30.3%Aug 10Aug 17Aug 24Aug 31Sep 7

Cumulative Flows

050,000,000100,000,000150,000,000200,000,000Aug 10Aug 17Aug 24Aug 31Sep 7

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/09/2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y5Y
Perf.
GBIL
BAMU
+0.30%+0.21%
+0.91%+0.65%
+2.40%+1.78%
+3.66%+2.75%
+14.12%n/a
+18.88%n/a
Flows
GBIL
BAMU
+$196M-
+$110M-$3M
+$1.10B-$5M
+$1.56B-$5M
+$1.77B-
+$5.85B-
Volatility and drawdown
3M1Y3Y5Y
Volatility
GBIL
BAMU
+0.19%+0.33%
+0.16%+0.31%
+0.21%n/a
+0.26%n/a
Max drawdown
GBIL
BAMU
n/an/a
-0.00%n/a
-0.00%n/a
-0.30%n/a
Max drawdown duration
GBIL
BAMU
n/an/a
2dn/a
2dn/a
335dn/a
Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free
GBIL
BAMU
Last sale
9/10/2026 at 6:22 PM
$99.95
$25.20
Previous close
09/09/2026
$99.95
$25.20
Consolidated volume
09/09/2026
Average volume
30 days
Average discount or premium
30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread
30 days
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

BAMU
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an index

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free
GBIL
BAMU
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/10/2026 at 6:22 PM
Live
Closed
GBIL
BAMU
Last price
$99.95
$25.20
1D performance
+0.00%
+0.00%
AuM$7.78 B$66.50 M
E/R0.14%1.02%
Characteristics
GBIL
BAMU
Management strategyPassiveActive
ProviderGoldman SachsBrookstone Asset Management
BenchmarkFTSE U.S. Treasury 0-1 Year Composite Select Index-
N° of holdings37100
Asset classBonds-
Trailing 12m distribution yield
Join
Join
Inception dateSeptember 6, 2016September 27, 2023
ESGNoNo
Advertisement
Exposure

Countries

GBIL
USA
90.49%
Other
9.51%
BAMU
USA
100.07%
Other
-0.07%

Sectors

GBIL
Sovereign
90.49%
Other
9.51%
BAMU
Sovereign
98.49%
Other
1.51%

Diversification

GBIL

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

57.81%
BAMU

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

37.47%

Top 15 holdings

Data as of July 31, 2026
GBIL
USA, Bills 0% 22sep2026, USD (119D)
7.65%
USA, Notes 4.125% 31jan2027, USD (AW-2027)
4.63%
USA, Bills 0% 6aug2026, USD (364D)
4.56%
USA, Bills 0% 4aug2026, USD (119D)
4.38%
USA, Bills 0% 18aug2026, USD (119D)
4.29%
USA, Bills 0% 24sep2026, USD (182D)
3.89%
USA, Notes 3.5% 30sep2026, USD (BH-2026)
3.82%
USA, Notes 3.875% 31mar2027, USD (AZ-2027)
3.65%
USA, Notes 3.75% 30apr2027, USD (BA-2027)
3.65%
USA, Bills 0% 25aug2026, USD (119D)
3.41%
USA, Notes 4.125% 28feb2027, USD (AY-2027)
3.31%
USA, Bills 0% 29oct2026, USD (364D)
2.82%
USA, Bills 0% 27nov2026, USD (364D)
2.75%
USA, Notes 4.5% 15may2027, USD (AN-2027)
2.61%
USA, Notes 4.25% 30nov2026, USD (BL-2026)
2.39%
BAMU
USA, Bills 0% 3sep2026, USD (364D)
3.22%
USA, Bills 0% 10sep2026, USD (182D)
3.21%
USA, Bills 0% 22sep2026, USD (119D)
3.20%
USA, Bills 0% 29oct2026, USD (364D)
3.07%
USA, Bills 0% 1oct2026, USD (364D)
2.73%
USA, Bills 0% 1sep2026, USD (119D)
2.61%
USA, Bills 0% 17sep2026, USD (182D)
2.53%
USA, Bills 0% 15sep2026, USD (119D)
2.47%
USA, Bills 0% 29sep2026, USD (119D)
2.21%
USA, Bills 0% 15oct2026, USD (182D)
2.20%
USA, Bills 0% 25aug2026, USD (119D)
2.18%
USA, Bills 0% 22oct2026, USD (182D)
2.10%
USA, Bills 0% 18aug2026, USD (119D)
2.04%
USA, Bills 0% 24sep2026, USD (182D)
2.01%
USA, Bills 0% 27nov2026, USD (364D)
1.69%
Frequently asked questions about GBIL and BAMU

How have the GBIL and BAMU ETFs performed in 2026?

As of September 9, 2026, GBIL is up 2.4% year-to-date (YTD), while BAMU has returned 1.78%. That puts GBIL better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GBIL or BAMU?

Year-to-date, the GBIL ETF saw +$1.10B in flows, compared to -$5M for BAMU.

Which ETF is more volatile: GBIL or BAMU?

Over the past year, GBIL had a volatility of 0.16%, while BAMU experienced 0.31%.

Which ETF is bigger: GBIL or BAMU?

As of September 9, 2026, GBIL holds $7.78 B in assets under management (AUM), while BAMU manages $66.50 M.

What sectors do the GBIL and BAMU ETFs invest in?

GBIL leans toward sectors like Sovereign. Meanwhile, BAMU focuses on Sovereign.

What are the top holdings of the GBIL ETF and BAMU ETF?

GBIL top holdings include USA, Bills 0% 22sep2026, USD (119D), USA, Notes 4.125% 31jan2027, USD (AW-2027) and USA, Bills 0% 6aug2026, USD (364D). BAMU holds in its top three: USA, Bills 0% 3sep2026, USD (364D), USA, Bills 0% 10sep2026, USD (182D) and USA, Bills 0% 22sep2026, USD (119D).

Which ETF is more diversified: GBIL or BAMU?

GBIL holds 37 securities with 57.81% of its assets in the top 15. BAMU has 100 securities and a top 15 weight of 37.47%.

Advertisement
Latest news about GBIL & BAMU
Advertisement
Advertisement
The Active Trader Report

Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up

Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.

Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up