Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
FWDvsQOWZETF Comparison
AB Disruptors ETF (FWD) belongs to the Uncategorized Equities segment. Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF (QOWZ) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care. FWD is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.65%, versus 0.39% for QOWZ. FWD is up 8.36% year-to-date (YTD) with +$220M in YTD flows. QOWZ performs worse with -9.52% YTD performance, and - in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FWD and QOWZ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FWD vs QOWZ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FWD QOWZ | -1.44%-2.97% | +5.34%-9.60% | +8.36%-9.52% | +57.51%+5.03% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | FWD QOWZ | +$117M- | +$231M-$9K | +$220M- | +$681M-$3M | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FWD QOWZ | +22.87%+15.74% | +25.09%+21.18% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | FWD QOWZ | -7.49%-11.00% | -18.20%-13.59% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | FWD QOWZ | 14d75d | 45d45d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
FWD | QOWZ | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $109.40 | $32.39 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $110.25 | $32.73 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
FWD | QOWZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
FWD | QOWZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $109.40 | $32.39 |
| 1D performance | -0.77% | -1.06% |
| AuM | $1.63 B | $12.96 M |
| E/R | 0.65% | 0.39% |
FWD | QOWZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | AllianceBernstein | Invesco |
| Benchmark | - | Nasdaq US Free Cash Flow Achievers Index |
| N° of holdings | 107 | 50 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 22, 2023 | December 5, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the FWD and QOWZ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, FWD is up 8.36% year-to-date (YTD), while QOWZ has lost -9.52%. That puts FWD better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FWD or QOWZ?
Year-to-date, the FWD ETF saw +$220M in flows, compared to - for QOWZ.
Which ETF is more volatile: FWD or QOWZ?
Over the past year, FWD had a volatility of 25.09%, while QOWZ experienced 21.18%.
Which ETF is bigger: FWD or QOWZ?
As of March 11, 2026, FWD holds $1.63 B in assets under management (AUM), while QOWZ manages $12.96 M.
What sectors do the FWD and QOWZ ETFs invest in?
FWD leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care. Meanwhile, QOWZ focuses on Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the FWD ETF and QOWZ ETF?
FWD top holdings include NVIDIA, TWN SEMICONT MAN and BROADCOM LIMITED. QOWZ holds in its top three: NVIDIA, META PLATFORMS and BROADCOM LIMITED.
Which ETF is more diversified: FWD or QOWZ?
FWD holds 122 securities with 25.76% of its assets in the top 15. QOWZ has 50 securities and a top 15 weight of 57.33%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
