FWDvsIOOETF Comparison
VS
AB Disruptors ETF (FWD) belongs to the Uncategorized Equities segment. iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) is part of the Global Large Cap segment. FWD's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Healthcare. In contrast, IOO's top sector exposures are Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Finance. FWD is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.65%, versus 0.4% for IOO. FWD is up 12.91% year-to-date (YTD) with +$1.74B in YTD flows. IOO performs better with 13.99% YTD performance, and +$161M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FWD and IOO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FWD vs IOO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 11/03/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FWD IOO | -12.84%-1.32% | -7.62%-1.07% | +12.91%+13.99% | +7.53%+16.13% | +124.60%+97.28% | n/a+101.23% |
| Flows | FWD IOO | +$34M+$65M | +$359M+$139M | +$1.74B+$161M | +$1.79B+$299M | +$2.54B+$802M | -+$1.46B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FWD IOO | +22.78%+11.54% | +27.47%+14.61% | +24.34%+16.10% | n/a+17.26% |
| Max drawdown | FWD IOO | -14.36%-4.33% | -21.45%-9.86% | -28.27%-19.16% | n/a-23.35% |
| Max drawdown duration | FWD IOO | 78d29d | 134d76d | 152d107d | n/a554d |
Trading data
FWD | IOO | |
Last sale 11/5/2026 at 2:30 PM | $108.18 | $138.19 |
| Previous close 11/04/2026 | $116.85 | $143.62 |
| Consolidated volume 11/04/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FWD
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexFWD | IOO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 11/5/2026 at 2:30 PM
Live
Closed
FWD | IOO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $108.18 | $138.19 |
| 1D performance | -7.42% | -3.78% |
| AuM | $3.12 B | $9.24 B |
| E/R | 0.65% | 0.4% |
Characteristics
FWD | IOO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | AllianceBernstein | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | S&P Global 100 Index |
| N° of holdings | 115 | 101 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 22, 2023 | December 5, 2000 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FWD
USA
73.35%
Other
26.65%
IOO
USA
79.36%
Other
20.64%
Sectors
FWD
Technology
61.01%
Industrials
15.24%
Healthcare
9.84%
Other
13.91%
IOO
Technology
57.39%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
11.3%
Finance
9.56%
Healthcare
8.91%
Other
12.84%
Advertisement
Diversification
FWD
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
28.88%
IOO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
66.88%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
FWD
NVIDIA Corp.
3.96%
Microsoft Corp.
2.86%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
2.41%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.10%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.08%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
1.98%
Amazon.com, Inc.
1.88%
Broadcom Inc.
1.70%
ASML Holding NV
1.62%
Merck & Co., Inc.
1.47%
Caterpillar, Inc.
1.46%
Space Exploration Technologies Corp.
1.42%
KLA Corp.
1.38%
Intel Corp.
1.33%
Palantir Technologies, Inc.
1.25%
IOO
NVIDIA Corp.
13.33%
Apple, Inc.
11.72%
Microsoft Corp.
9.18%
Amazon.com, Inc.
5.90%
Alphabet, Inc.
4.87%
Broadcom Inc.
4.03%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.91%
Eli Lilly & Co.
2.23%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
2.18%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
2.12%
ASML Holding NV
1.69%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
1.61%
Johnson & Johnson
1.54%
Intel Corp.
1.44%
Walmart, Inc.
1.12%
Frequently asked questions about FWD and IOO
How have the FWD and IOO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of November 3, 2026, FWD is up 12.91% year-to-date (YTD), while IOO has returned 13.99%. That puts IOO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FWD or IOO?
Year-to-date, the FWD ETF saw +$1.74B in flows, compared to +$161M for IOO.
Which ETF is more volatile: FWD or IOO?
Over the past year, FWD had a volatility of 27.47%, while IOO experienced 14.61%.
Which ETF is bigger: FWD or IOO?
As of November 3, 2026, FWD holds $3.12 B in assets under management (AUM), while IOO manages $9.24 B.
What sectors do the FWD and IOO ETFs invest in?
FWD leans toward sectors like Technology, Industrials and Healthcare. Meanwhile, IOO focuses on Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Finance.
What are the top holdings of the FWD ETF and IOO ETF?
FWD top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Microsoft Corp. and Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.. IOO holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: FWD or IOO?
FWD holds 115 securities with 28.88% of its assets in the top 15. IOO has 103 securities and a top 15 weight of 66.88%.
Advertisement
Latest news about FWD & IOO
Global Equity Investing: ETF Alternatives to Vanguard's VT
May 24, 2023
IOO
AllianceBernstein Launches 3 New Active ETFs
April 18, 2023
FWD
Advertisement
Advertisement
