FWDvsAQLTETF Comparison
VS
AB Disruptors ETF (FWD) belongs to the Uncategorized Equities segment. iShares MSCI Global Quality Factor ETF (AQLT) is part of the Global Blended Cap segment. FWD's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Healthcare. In contrast, AQLT's top sector exposures are Technology, Healthcare and Industrials. FWD is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.65%, versus 0.22% for AQLT. FWD is up 11.58% year-to-date (YTD) with +$1.74B in YTD flows. AQLT performs better with 11.6% YTD performance, and +$106M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FWD and AQLT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FWD vs AQLT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 11/02/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FWD AQLT | -13.20%-3.62% | -8.70%-0.56% | +11.58%+11.60% | +6.26%+13.51% | +125.99%n/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | FWD AQLT | +$38M+$6M | +$359M+$39M | +$1.74B+$106M | +$1.79B+$106M | +$2.55B- | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FWD AQLT | +22.81%+11.22% | +27.50%+14.53% | +24.35%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | FWD AQLT | -14.36%-4.21% | -21.45%-10.79% | -28.27%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | FWD AQLT | 77d28d | 133d50d | 152dn/a | n/an/a |
Trading data
FWD | AQLT | |
Last sale 11/4/2026 at 2:30 PM | $116.85 | $31.82 |
| Previous close 11/03/2026 | $118.08 | $31.27 |
| Consolidated volume 11/03/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FWD
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexFWD | AQLT | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 11/4/2026 at 2:30 PM
Live
Closed
FWD | AQLT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $116.85 | $31.82 |
| 1D performance | -1.04% | +1.74% |
| AuM | $3.08 B | $337.35 M |
| E/R | 0.65% | 0.22% |
Characteristics
FWD | AQLT | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | AllianceBernstein | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | MSCI ACWI Quality Index |
| N° of holdings | 115 | 473 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 22, 2023 | December 11, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FWD
USA
73.35%
Other
26.65%
AQLT
USA
69.42%
Taiwan
7.45%
Other
23.13%
Sectors
FWD
Technology
61.01%
Industrials
15.24%
Healthcare
9.84%
Other
13.91%
AQLT
Technology
53.62%
Healthcare
13.01%
Industrials
9.09%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.26%
Finance
7.42%
Other
8.61%
Advertisement
Diversification
FWD
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
28.88%
AQLT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
48.58%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
FWD
NVIDIA Corp.
3.96%
Microsoft Corp.
2.86%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
2.41%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.10%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.08%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
1.98%
Amazon.com, Inc.
1.88%
Broadcom Inc.
1.70%
ASML Holding NV
1.62%
Merck & Co., Inc.
1.47%
Caterpillar, Inc.
1.46%
Space Exploration Technologies Corp.
1.42%
KLA Corp.
1.38%
Intel Corp.
1.33%
Palantir Technologies, Inc.
1.25%
AQLT
Microsoft Corp.
5.86%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
5.33%
Apple, Inc.
5.32%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
5.08%
NVIDIA Corp.
4.94%
Broadcom Inc.
4.08%
Eli Lilly & Co.
2.87%
ASML Holding NV
2.66%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.37%
Visa, Inc.
2.17%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.86%
Johnson & Johnson
1.85%
Lam Research Corp.
1.51%
Applied Materials, Inc.
1.42%
Mastercard, Inc.
1.26%
Frequently asked questions about FWD and AQLT
How have the FWD and AQLT ETFs performed in 2026?
As of November 2, 2026, FWD is up 11.58% year-to-date (YTD), while AQLT has returned 11.6%. That puts AQLT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FWD or AQLT?
Year-to-date, the FWD ETF saw +$1.74B in flows, compared to +$106M for AQLT.
Which ETF is more volatile: FWD or AQLT?
Over the past year, FWD had a volatility of 27.5%, while AQLT experienced 14.53%.
Which ETF is bigger: FWD or AQLT?
As of November 2, 2026, FWD holds $3.08 B in assets under management (AUM), while AQLT manages $337.35 M.
What sectors do the FWD and AQLT ETFs invest in?
FWD leans toward sectors like Technology, Industrials and Healthcare. Meanwhile, AQLT focuses on Technology, Healthcare and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the FWD ETF and AQLT ETF?
FWD top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Microsoft Corp. and Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.. AQLT holds in its top three: Microsoft Corp., Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. and Apple, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: FWD or AQLT?
FWD holds 115 securities with 28.88% of its assets in the top 15. AQLT has 484 securities and a top 15 weight of 48.58%.
Advertisement
Latest news about FWD & AQLT
Advertisement
