FVDvsAUSFETF Comparison
VS
First Trust Value Line Dividend ETF - USD (FVD) belongs to the US High Dividend segment. Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. FVD's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Utilities and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. In contrast, AUSF's top sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Healthcare. FVD is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.61%, versus 0.27% for AUSF. FVD is up 12.04% year-to-date (YTD) with -$794M in YTD flows. AUSF performs better with 14.52% YTD performance, and +$68M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FVD and AUSF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FVD vs AUSF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/28/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FVD AUSF | +5.35%+6.48% | +7.46%+7.81% | +12.04%+14.52% | +14.95%+19.49% | +33.93%+71.74% | +40.80%+100.92% |
| Flows | FVD AUSF | -$81M+$7M | -$250M-$6M | -$794M+$68M | -$1.62B+$132M | -$5.68B+$533M | -$5.60B+$521M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FVD AUSF | +12.25%+10.78% | +10.15%+10.07% | +11.38%+12.67% | +12.98%+13.64% |
| Max drawdown | FVD AUSF | -2.89%-3.23% | -7.26%-5.65% | -11.94%-12.33% | -16.64%-14.13% |
| Max drawdown duration | FVD AUSF | 42d22d | 136d101d | 233d204d | 792d215d |
Trading data
FVD | AUSF | |
Last sale 7/29/2026 at 1:30 PM | $50.85 | $52.22 |
| Previous close 07/28/2026 | $51.02 | $52.39 |
| Consolidated volume 07/28/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FVD | AUSF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/29/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FVD | AUSF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $50.85 | $52.22 |
| 1D performance | -0.33% | -0.33% |
| AuM | $8.44 B | $914.90 M |
| E/R | 0.61% | 0.27% |
Characteristics
FVD | AUSF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | First Trust | Global X |
| Benchmark | Value Line Dividend Index | Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Factor Index |
| N° of holdings | 249 | 191 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 19, 2003 | August 24, 2018 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FVD
USA
79.34%
Other
20.66%
AUSF
USA
94.6%
Other
5.4%
Sectors
FVD
Finance
29.31%
Utilities
17.05%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.98%
Industrials
10.61%
Healthcare
7.71%
Other
24.34%
AUSF
Finance
24.6%
Technology
13.8%
Healthcare
11.51%
Industrials
10.48%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.13%
Other
29.48%
Advertisement
Diversification
FVD
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
6.56%
AUSF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
23.59%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
FVD
Brown & Brown, Inc.
0.45%
Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
0.45%
RLI Corp.
0.45%
The Kraft Heinz Co.
0.44%
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.
0.44%
Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc.
0.44%
General Mills, Inc.
0.44%
International Business Machines Corp.
0.44%
The Marzetti Co.
0.43%
Labcorp Holdings, Inc.
0.43%
Automatic Data Processing, Inc.
0.43%
Conagra Brands, Inc.
0.43%
Johnson & Johnson
0.43%
Quest Diagnostics, Inc.
0.43%
Kimberly-Clark Corp.
0.43%
AUSF
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.97%
Verizon Communications, Inc.
1.91%
Royalty Pharma Plc
1.71%
Johnson & Johnson
1.71%
AT&T, Inc.
1.67%
Altria Group, Inc.
1.56%
Linde Plc
1.54%
Electronic Arts, Inc.
1.51%
Chart Industries, Inc.
1.50%
Waste Management, Inc.
1.44%
TXNM Energy, Inc.
1.44%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.43%
The TJX Cos., Inc.
1.42%
RTX Corp.
1.41%
Motorola Solutions, Inc.
1.39%
Frequently asked questions about FVD and AUSF
How have the FVD and AUSF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 28, 2026, FVD is up 12.04% year-to-date (YTD), while AUSF has returned 14.52%. That puts AUSF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FVD or AUSF?
Year-to-date, the FVD ETF saw -$794M in flows, compared to +$68M for AUSF.
Which ETF is more volatile: FVD or AUSF?
Over the past year, FVD had a volatility of 10.15%, while AUSF experienced 10.07%.
Which ETF is bigger: FVD or AUSF?
As of July 28, 2026, FVD holds $8.44 B in assets under management (AUM), while AUSF manages $914.90 M.
What sectors do the FVD and AUSF ETFs invest in?
FVD leans toward sectors like Finance, Utilities and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. Meanwhile, AUSF focuses on Finance, Technology and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the FVD ETF and AUSF ETF?
FVD top holdings include Brown & Brown, Inc., Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. and RLI Corp.. AUSF holds in its top three: Cisco Systems, Inc., Verizon Communications, Inc. and Royalty Pharma Plc.
Which ETF is more diversified: FVD or AUSF?
FVD holds 249 securities with 6.56% of its assets in the top 15. AUSF has 194 securities and a top 15 weight of 23.59%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
