FVCvsMOATETF Comparison
VS
First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus 5 ETF (FVC) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. FVC's top 3 sector exposures are Energy, Technology and Healthcare. In contrast, MOAT's top sector exposures are Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Healthcare. FVC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.87%, versus 0.46% for MOAT. FVC is up 11.45% year-to-date (YTD) with -$12M in YTD flows. MOAT performs worse with 2.62% YTD performance, and -$1.50B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FVC and MOAT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FVC vs MOAT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FVC MOAT | -2.79%+4.88% | +9.47%+3.84% | +11.45%+2.62% | +15.81%+11.66% | +23.64%+34.57% | +24.06%+54.10% |
| Flows | FVC MOAT | -$2M-$247M | -$4M-$921M | -$12M-$1.50B | -$24M-$2.30B | -$167M-$2.04B | -$120M+$1.16B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FVC MOAT | +21.06%+13.53% | +15.76%+13.89% | +15.43%+15.56% | +16.12%+18.27% |
| Max drawdown | FVC MOAT | -7.36%-3.66% | -13.45%-12.41% | -14.34%-21.39% | -22.59%-23.94% |
| Max drawdown duration | FVC MOAT | 16d29d | 96d183d | 397d226d | 1102d571d |
Trading data
FVC | MOAT | |
Last sale 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM | $40.21 | $106.26 |
| Previous close 07/16/2026 | $40.50 | $107.59 |
| Consolidated volume 07/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FVC | MOAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FVC | MOAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $40.21 | $106.26 |
| 1D performance | -0.73% | -1.24% |
| AuM | $105.38 M | $11.68 B |
| E/R | 0.87% | 0.46% |
Characteristics
FVC | MOAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | First Trust | VanEck |
| Benchmark | Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus Five Index | Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index |
| N° of holdings | 156 | 57 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 17, 2016 | April 24, 2012 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FVC
USA
95.35%
Other
4.65%
MOAT
USA
96.49%
Other
3.51%
Sectors
FVC
Energy
34.59%
Technology
22.21%
Healthcare
20.21%
Industrials
14.9%
Other
8.1%
MOAT
Technology
26.85%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
22.06%
Healthcare
16.78%
Finance
9.65%
Business Services
8.83%
Industrials
7.36%
Other
8.46%
Advertisement
Diversification
FVC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
26.09%
MOAT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
39.96%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of May 31, 2026
FVC
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.64%
Intel Corp.
2.52%
Ford Motor Co.
1.84%
ConocoPhillips
1.78%
QUALCOMM, Inc.
1.69%
EOG Resources, Inc.
1.68%
Chevron Corp.
1.66%
General Motors Co.
1.64%
Exxon Mobil Corp.
1.63%
Tesla, Inc.
1.62%
Union Pacific Corp.
1.56%
Broadcom Inc.
1.51%
Devon Energy Corp.
1.50%
Marvell Technology, Inc.
1.41%
Occidental Petroleum Corp.
1.40%
MOAT
NXP Semiconductors NV
3.51%
Masco Corp.
2.90%
Airbnb, Inc.
2.87%
Mondelez International, Inc.
2.83%
NVIDIA Corp.
2.76%
Constellation Brands, Inc.
2.70%
Bristol Myers Squibb Co.
2.70%
Fortinet, Inc.
2.67%
Kenvue, Inc.
2.61%
Zoetis, Inc.
2.45%
Brown-Forman Corp.
2.45%
LPL Financial Holdings, Inc.
2.44%
Microsoft Corp.
2.41%
TransUnion
2.34%
Otis Worldwide Corp.
2.32%
Frequently asked questions about FVC and MOAT
How have the FVC and MOAT ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 16, 2026, FVC is up 11.45% year-to-date (YTD), while MOAT has returned 2.62%. That puts FVC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FVC or MOAT?
Year-to-date, the FVC ETF saw -$12M in flows, compared to -$1.50B for MOAT.
Which ETF is more volatile: FVC or MOAT?
Over the past year, FVC had a volatility of 15.76%, while MOAT experienced 13.89%.
Which ETF is bigger: FVC or MOAT?
As of July 16, 2026, FVC holds $105.38 M in assets under management (AUM), while MOAT manages $11.68 B.
What sectors do the FVC and MOAT ETFs invest in?
FVC leans toward sectors like Energy, Technology and Healthcare. Meanwhile, MOAT focuses on Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the FVC ETF and MOAT ETF?
FVC top holdings include Micron Technology, Inc., Intel Corp. and Ford Motor Co.. MOAT holds in its top three: NXP Semiconductors NV, Masco Corp. and Airbnb, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: FVC or MOAT?
FVC holds 156 securities with 26.09% of its assets in the top 15. MOAT has 57 securities and a top 15 weight of 39.96%.
Advertisement
Latest news about FVC & MOAT
The ETF Underdogs, Part 9: Wide Moats and Competitive Advantages
July 7, 2026
MOAT
Invest like Warren Buffett with These Two ETFs
March 21, 2025
MOAT
Advertisement
Advertisement
