FVCvsDUKQETF Comparison
VS
First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus 5 ETF (FVC) and Ocean Park Domestic ETF (DUKQ) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. FVC's top 3 sector exposures are Healthcare, Technology and Industrials. In contrast, DUKQ's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Healthcare. FVC is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.87%, versus 2.96% for DUKQ. FVC is up 16.65% year-to-date (YTD) with -$12M in YTD flows. DUKQ performs worse with 14.92% YTD performance, and -$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FVC and DUKQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FVC vs DUKQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/03/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FVC DUKQ | +4.92%+1.88% | -0.91%+1.65% | +16.65%+14.92% | +19.52%+20.12% | +33.76%n/a | +22.58%n/a |
| Flows | FVC DUKQ | --$72K | -$2M-$386K | -$12M-$2M | -$21M-$3M | -$150M- | -$113M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FVC DUKQ | +22.03%+15.04% | +16.92%+13.50% | +15.64%n/a | +16.24%n/a |
| Max drawdown | FVC DUKQ | -9.33%-4.12% | -13.45%-7.80% | -14.34%n/a | -22.59%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | FVC DUKQ | 65d34d | 96d64d | 397dn/a | 1102dn/a |
Trading data
FVC | DUKQ | |
Last sale 9/3/2026 at 3:20 PM | $42.22 | $31.91 |
| Previous close 09/03/2026 | $42.00 | $31.98 |
| Consolidated volume 09/03/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
DUKQ
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexFVC | DUKQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/3/2026 at 3:20 PM
Live
Closed
FVC | DUKQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $42.22 | $31.91 |
| 1D performance | +0.53% | -0.21% |
| AuM | $110.31 M | $13.43 M |
| E/R | 0.87% | 2.96% |
Characteristics
FVC | DUKQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | First Trust | Ocean Park Asset Management |
| Benchmark | Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus Five Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 230 | 2995 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 17, 2016 | July 10, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FVC
USA
91.69%
Other
8.31%
DUKQ
USA
94.97%
Other
5.03%
Sectors
FVC
Healthcare
41.39%
Technology
34%
Industrials
14.33%
Other
10.28%
DUKQ
Technology
34.1%
Finance
14.58%
Healthcare
10.04%
Industrials
8.85%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.92%
Other
24.5%
Advertisement
Diversification
FVC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
21.56%
DUKQ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
23.15%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
FVC
Union Pacific Corp.
1.63%
Merck & Co., Inc.
1.57%
General Motors Co.
1.56%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.54%
Amgen, Inc.
1.50%
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
1.49%
AbbVie, Inc.
1.47%
Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
1.43%
Biogen, Inc.
1.42%
Ford Motor Co.
1.41%
Johnson & Johnson
1.41%
Bristol Myers Squibb Co.
1.37%
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
1.34%
Tesla, Inc.
1.22%
Incyte Corp.
1.21%
DUKQ
Apple, Inc.
3.93%
NVIDIA Corp.
3.72%
Microsoft Corp.
2.30%
Amazon.com, Inc.
1.86%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.53%
Broadcom Inc.
1.42%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.31%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.23%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.18%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.02%
Tesla, Inc.
0.90%
Sandisk Corp.
0.79%
Walmart, Inc.
0.75%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
0.62%
Costco Wholesale Corp.
0.59%
Frequently asked questions about FVC and DUKQ
How have the FVC and DUKQ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 3, 2026, FVC is up 16.65% year-to-date (YTD), while DUKQ has returned 14.92%. That puts FVC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FVC or DUKQ?
Year-to-date, the FVC ETF saw -$12M in flows, compared to -$2M for DUKQ.
Which ETF is more volatile: FVC or DUKQ?
Over the past year, FVC had a volatility of 16.92%, while DUKQ experienced 13.5%.
Which ETF is bigger: FVC or DUKQ?
As of September 3, 2026, FVC holds $110.31 M in assets under management (AUM), while DUKQ manages $13.43 M.
What sectors do the FVC and DUKQ ETFs invest in?
FVC leans toward sectors like Healthcare, Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, DUKQ focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the FVC ETF and DUKQ ETF?
FVC top holdings include Union Pacific Corp., Merck & Co., Inc. and General Motors Co.. DUKQ holds in its top three: Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp. and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: FVC or DUKQ?
FVC holds 231 securities with 21.56% of its assets in the top 15. DUKQ has 3074 securities and a top 15 weight of 23.15%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
