FVALvsRECSETF Comparison
VS
Fidelity Value Factor ETF (FVAL) belongs to the US Large Cap Value segment. Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Both FVAL and RECS have the same Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.15%. FVAL is up 14.56% year-to-date (YTD) with +$105M in YTD flows. RECS performs worse with 10.01% YTD performance, and +$815M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FVAL and RECS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FVAL vs RECS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/30/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FVAL RECS | +1.29%-0.31% | +2.75%+2.12% | +14.56%+10.01% | +18.00%+10.70% | +85.99%+89.64% | +78.04%+82.79% |
| Flows | FVAL RECS | +$50K+$78M | +$16M+$108M | +$105M+$815M | +$97M+$1.33B | +$303M+$4.62B | +$473M+$4.81B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FVAL RECS | +9.60%+9.60% | +11.75%+11.76% | +14.14%+14.41% | +16.36%+16.51% |
| Max drawdown | FVAL RECS | -2.95%-2.34% | -8.88%-8.79% | -18.14%-18.49% | -23.38%-22.06% |
| Max drawdown duration | FVAL RECS | 57d32d | 72d66d | 131d126d | 702d573d |
Trading data
FVAL | RECS | |
Last sale 10/30/2026 at 1:30 PM | $81.99 | $44.93 |
| Previous close 10/29/2026 | $82.80 | $45.62 |
| Consolidated volume 10/29/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FVAL | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/30/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FVAL | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $81.99 | $44.93 |
| 1D performance | -0.98% | -1.51% |
| AuM | $1.37 B | $6.13 B |
| E/R | 0.15% | 0.15% |
Characteristics
FVAL | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Fidelity | Columbia Threadneedle Investments |
| Benchmark | Fidelity U.S. Value Factor Index | Beta Advantage Research Enhanced U.S. Equity Index |
| N° of holdings | 131 | 346 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 12, 2016 | September 25, 2019 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FVAL
USA
97.22%
Other
2.78%
RECS
USA
98.88%
Other
1.12%
Sectors
FVAL
Technology
45.75%
Finance
13.72%
Healthcare
9.92%
Industrials
8.33%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.65%
Other
14.63%
RECS
Technology
44.95%
Finance
12.49%
Healthcare
8.12%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.44%
Other
27%
Advertisement
Diversification
FVAL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
50.12%
RECS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
48.54%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
FVAL
NVIDIA Corp.
8.36%
Apple, Inc.
7.85%
Microsoft Corp.
6.09%
Alphabet, Inc.
5.07%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.52%
Broadcom Inc.
3.01%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.73%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.52%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.93%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.74%
Tesla, Inc.
1.61%
Sandisk Corp.
1.56%
Visa, Inc.
1.43%
Johnson & Johnson
1.36%
QUALCOMM, Inc.
1.35%
RECS
NVIDIA Corp.
12.50%
Apple, Inc.
12.08%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
4.58%
US81369Y8527
2.65%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.39%
Mastercard, Inc.
2.35%
US92204A8844
1.95%
Bank of America Corp.
1.69%
Chevron Corp.
1.56%
The TJX Cos., Inc.
1.35%
Altria Group, Inc.
1.25%
Palantir Technologies, Inc.
1.09%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.06%
Citigroup, Inc.
1.03%
Bristol Myers Squibb Co.
1.01%
Frequently asked questions about FVAL and RECS
How have the FVAL and RECS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 30, 2026, FVAL is up 14.56% year-to-date (YTD), while RECS has returned 10.01%. That puts FVAL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FVAL or RECS?
Year-to-date, the FVAL ETF saw +$105M in flows, compared to +$815M for RECS.
Which ETF is more volatile: FVAL or RECS?
Over the past year, FVAL had a volatility of 11.75%, while RECS experienced 11.76%.
Which ETF is bigger: FVAL or RECS?
As of October 30, 2026, FVAL holds $1.37 B in assets under management (AUM), while RECS manages $6.13 B.
What sectors do the FVAL and RECS ETFs invest in?
FVAL leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, RECS focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the FVAL ETF and RECS ETF?
FVAL top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp.. RECS holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: FVAL or RECS?
FVAL holds 131 securities with 50.12% of its assets in the top 15. RECS has 448 securities and a top 15 weight of 48.54%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
