Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
FTXNvsRSPGETF Comparison
First Trust Nasdaq Oil & Gas ETF (FTXN) and Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) belong to the same industry segment: US Energy. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: and Energy. FTXN is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%, versus 0.4% for RSPG. FTXN is up 24.63% year-to-date (YTD) with +$9M in YTD flows. RSPG performs better with 28.6% YTD performance, and +$7M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FTXN and RSPG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FTXN vs RSPG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FTXN RSPG | +6.31%+6.46% | +19.99%+24.52% | +24.63%+28.60% | +26.67%+36.53% | +41.12%+66.37% | +137.89%+166.67% |
| Flows | FTXN RSPG | +$12M-$33M | +$8M+$16M | +$9M+$7M | -$41M-$65M | -$1.07B-$159M | -$192M+$82M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FTXN RSPG | +23.30%+22.85% | +28.62%+27.80% | +23.98%+23.39% | +30.10%+28.59% |
| Max drawdown | FTXN RSPG | -6.10%-5.44% | -21.69%-21.08% | -26.87%-23.04% | -30.02%-28.42% |
| Max drawdown duration | FTXN RSPG | 33d22d | 293d222d | 667d415d | 150d429d |
FTXN | RSPG | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $35.69 | $102.31 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $34.77 | $99.90 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
FTXN | RSPG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
FTXN | RSPG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $35.69 | $102.31 |
| 1D performance | +2.65% | +2.41% |
| AuM | $132.22 M | $567.08 M |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.4% |
FTXN | RSPG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | First Trust | Invesco |
| Benchmark | NASDAQ US Smart Oil & Gas Index | S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy Plus Index |
| N° of holdings | 40 | 22 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 20, 2016 | November 1, 2006 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the FTXN and RSPG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, FTXN is up 24.63% year-to-date (YTD), while RSPG has returned 28.6%. That puts RSPG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FTXN or RSPG?
Year-to-date, the FTXN ETF saw +$9M in flows, compared to +$7M for RSPG.
Which ETF is more volatile: FTXN or RSPG?
Over the past year, FTXN had a volatility of 28.62%, while RSPG experienced 27.8%.
Which ETF is bigger: FTXN or RSPG?
As of March 10, 2026, FTXN holds $132.22 M in assets under management (AUM), while RSPG manages $567.08 M.
What sectors do the FTXN and RSPG ETFs invest in?
FTXN leans toward sectors like Energy. Meanwhile, RSPG focuses on Energy.
What are the top holdings of the FTXN ETF and RSPG ETF?
FTXN top holdings include EXXON, CHEVRON TEXACO and CONOCOPHILLIPS. RSPG holds in its top three: SCHLUMBERGER, HALLIBURTON and BAKER HUGHES.
Which ETF is more diversified: FTXN or RSPG?
FTXN holds 40 securities with 69.95% of its assets in the top 15. RSPG has 22 securities and a top 15 weight of 70.91%.
Crude and Natural Gas Markets on the Move
Crude Oil ETFs Surge Despite Falling Oil Prices
Energy Sector Plummets on Fed Comments and Crude Oil Stocks
Tony's ETF Buyers Guide: Equal-Weight ETFs
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
