Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
FTWOvsQQQMETF Comparison
Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap. FTWO's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Materials and Energy. In contrast, QQQM's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. FTWO is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.49%, versus 0.15% for QQQM. FTWO is up 8.69% year-to-date (YTD) with +$16M in YTD flows. QQQM performs worse with -5.24% YTD performance, and +$2.42B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FTWO and QQQM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FTWO vs QQQM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FTWO QQQM | -7.91%-4.39% | +7.42%-6.02% | +8.69%-5.24% | +42.40%+22.09% | n/a+93.84% | n/a+88.60% |
| Flows | FTWO QQQM | +$4M+$571M | +$16M+$2.62B | +$16M+$2.42B | +$36M+$19.53B | -+$44.74B | -+$52.41B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FTWO QQQM | +22.24%+15.78% | +21.44%+22.59% | n/a+19.60% | n/a+22.56% |
| Max drawdown | FTWO QQQM | -11.29%-8.06% | -14.13%-15.73% | n/a-22.82% | n/a-35.09% |
| Max drawdown duration | FTWO QQQM | 18d51d | 41d45d | n/a124d | n/a714d |
FTWO | QQQM | |
Last sale 3/20/2026 at 1:30 PM | $43.90 | $239.64 |
| Previous close 03/19/2026 | $45.22 | $244.20 |
| Consolidated volume 03/19/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
FTWO | QQQM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
FTWO | QQQM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $43.90 | $239.64 |
| 1D performance | -2.91% | -1.87% |
| AuM | $75.57 M | $68.75 B |
| E/R | 0.49% | 0.15% |
FTWO | QQQM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Strive Asset Management | Invesco |
| Benchmark | Bloomberg FAANG 2.0 Select Index | NASDAQ-100 Index |
| N° of holdings | 49 | 93 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 31, 2023 | October 13, 2020 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the FTWO and QQQM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 20, 2026, FTWO is up 8.69% year-to-date (YTD), while QQQM has lost -5.24%. That puts FTWO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FTWO or QQQM?
Year-to-date, the FTWO ETF saw +$16M in flows, compared to +$2.42B for QQQM.
Which ETF is more volatile: FTWO or QQQM?
Over the past year, FTWO had a volatility of 21.44%, while QQQM experienced 22.59%.
Which ETF is bigger: FTWO or QQQM?
As of March 20, 2026, FTWO holds $75.57 M in assets under management (AUM), while QQQM manages $68.75 B.
What sectors do the FTWO and QQQM ETFs invest in?
FTWO leans toward sectors like Industrials, Materials and Energy. Meanwhile, QQQM focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the FTWO ETF and QQQM ETF?
FTWO top holdings include DEERE, EXXON and CONSTELLATION ENERGY CORP. QQQM holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: FTWO or QQQM?
FTWO holds 50 securities with 67.6% of its assets in the top 15. QQQM has 101 securities and a top 15 weight of 57.63%.
The Fastest Growing and Shrinking ETFs of 2025 So Far
Strive Asset Management Moves Entire Lineup of ETFs to NYSE Floor
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
