Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
FTWOvsIWBETF Comparison
Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO) and iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap. FTWO's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Materials and Energy. In contrast, IWB's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. FTWO is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.49%, versus 0.15% for IWB. FTWO is up 11.86% year-to-date (YTD) with +$16M in YTD flows. IWB performs worse with -3.17% YTD performance, and +$336M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FTWO and IWB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FTWO vs IWB performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FTWO IWB | -5.21%-3.71% | +12.12%-3.09% | +11.86%-3.17% | +46.46%+17.38% | n/a+72.85% | n/a+73.94% |
| Flows | FTWO IWB | +$4M+$531M | +$16M+$653M | +$16M+$336M | +$36M+$1.60B | --$354M | -+$726M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FTWO IWB | +21.52%+12.25% | +21.23%+18.31% | n/a+14.97% | n/a+17.14% |
| Max drawdown | FTWO IWB | -8.70%-5.18% | -14.13%-13.95% | n/a-19.16% | n/a-25.17% |
| Max drawdown duration | FTWO IWB | 17d51d | 41d45d | n/a126d | n/a709d |
FTWO | IWB | |
Last sale 3/20/2026 at 1:30 PM | $43.90 | $354.95 |
| Previous close 03/19/2026 | $45.22 | $360.65 |
| Consolidated volume 03/19/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
FTWO | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
FTWO | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $43.90 | $354.95 |
| 1D performance | -2.91% | -1.58% |
| AuM | $77.33 M | $45.04 B |
| E/R | 0.49% | 0.15% |
FTWO | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Strive Asset Management | iShares |
| Benchmark | Bloomberg FAANG 2.0 Select Index | Russell 1000 Index |
| N° of holdings | 49 | 912 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 31, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the FTWO and IWB ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 19, 2026, FTWO is up 11.86% year-to-date (YTD), while IWB has lost -3.17%. That puts FTWO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FTWO or IWB?
Year-to-date, the FTWO ETF saw +$16M in flows, compared to +$336M for IWB.
Which ETF is more volatile: FTWO or IWB?
Over the past year, FTWO had a volatility of 21.23%, while IWB experienced 18.31%.
Which ETF is bigger: FTWO or IWB?
As of March 19, 2026, FTWO holds $77.33 M in assets under management (AUM), while IWB manages $45.04 B.
What sectors do the FTWO and IWB ETFs invest in?
FTWO leans toward sectors like Industrials, Materials and Energy. Meanwhile, IWB focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the FTWO ETF and IWB ETF?
FTWO top holdings include DEERE, EXXON and CONSTELLATION ENERGY CORP. IWB holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: FTWO or IWB?
FTWO holds 50 securities with 67.6% of its assets in the top 15. IWB has 1006 securities and a top 15 weight of 39.23%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
