FTNJvsTHYMETF Comparison
Franklin New Jersey Municipal Income ETF (FTNJ) and T. Rowe Price High Income Municipal ETF (THYM) belong to the same industry segment: Municipal Bonds. Both ETFs have the same top 1 sector exposures: Municipal. FTNJ is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.32% for THYM. FTNJ is down -1.74% year-to-date (YTD) with +$35M in YTD flows. THYM performs better with 2.2% YTD performance, and +$5M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FTNJ and THYM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FTNJ vs THYM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FTNJ THYM | -1.02%-0.16% | -2.48%-0.80% | -1.74%+2.20% | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | FTNJ THYM | +$3M+$1M | +$11M+$3M | +$35M+$5M | -- | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FTNJ THYM | +3.09%+2.98% | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | FTNJ THYM | -3.33%-2.09% | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | FTNJ THYM | 63d57d | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
FTNJ | THYM | |
Last sale 9/2/2026 at 1:30 PM | $8.55 | $49.39 |
| Previous close 09/01/2026 | $8.57 | $49.39 |
| Consolidated volume 09/01/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
FTNJ | THYM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $8.55 | $49.39 |
| 1D performance | -0.23% | +0.02% |
| AuM | $172.06 M | $27.29 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.32% |
FTNJ | THYM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Franklin Templeton | T. Rowe Price |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 52 | 93 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 10, 2025 | November 19, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
