FTNJvsJHMUETF Comparison
Franklin New Jersey Municipal Income ETF (FTNJ) and John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF (JHMU) belong to the same industry segment: Municipal Bonds. Both ETFs have the same top 1 sector exposures: Municipal. FTNJ is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 1.01% for JHMU. FTNJ is down -1.77% year-to-date (YTD) with +$37M in YTD flows. JHMU performs better with 0.04% YTD performance, and +$4M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FTNJ and JHMU below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FTNJ vs JHMU performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FTNJ JHMU | -1.05%-0.49% | -2.67%-1.27% | -1.77%+0.04% | n/a+3.68% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | FTNJ JHMU | +$5M- | +$12M+$1M | +$37M+$4M | -+$14M | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FTNJ JHMU | +3.06%+2.61% | n/a+2.40% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | FTNJ JHMU | -3.36%-2.14% | n/a-2.73% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | FTNJ JHMU | 65d57d | n/a125d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
FTNJ | JHMU | |
Last sale 9/3/2026 at 1:30 PM | $8.54 | $25.55 |
| Previous close 09/03/2026 | $8.55 | $25.58 |
| Consolidated volume 09/03/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
FTNJ | JHMU | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $8.54 | $25.55 |
| 1D performance | -0.12% | -0.11% |
| AuM | $173.71 M | $43.49 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 1.01% |
FTNJ | JHMU | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Franklin Templeton | John Hancock Investments |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 52 | 47 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 10, 2025 | October 31, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
