FTNJvsCATFETF Comparison
Franklin New Jersey Municipal Income ETF (FTNJ) and American Century California Municipal Bond ETF (CATF) belong to the same industry segment: Municipal Bonds. Both ETFs have the same top 1 sector exposures: Municipal. FTNJ is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.25% for CATF. FTNJ is down -1.77% year-to-date (YTD) with +$37M in YTD flows. CATF performs better with -0.08% YTD performance, and +$27M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FTNJ and CATF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FTNJ vs CATF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FTNJ CATF | -1.05%-0.66% | -2.67%-1.76% | -1.77%-0.08% | n/a+4.15% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | FTNJ CATF | +$5M+$5M | +$12M+$10M | +$37M+$27M | -+$35M | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FTNJ CATF | +3.06%+2.63% | n/a+2.52% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | FTNJ CATF | -3.36%-2.42% | n/a-2.58% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | FTNJ CATF | 65d59d | n/a116d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
FTNJ | CATF | |
Last sale 9/3/2026 at 1:30 PM | $8.54 | $48.96 |
| Previous close 09/03/2026 | $8.55 | $48.98 |
| Consolidated volume 09/03/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
FTNJ | CATF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $8.54 | $48.96 |
| 1D performance | -0.12% | -0.03% |
| AuM | $173.71 M | $85.58 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.25% |
FTNJ | CATF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Franklin Templeton | American Century Investments |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 52 | 107 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 10, 2025 | July 18, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15