FTNJvsCAMETF Comparison
Franklin New Jersey Municipal Income ETF (FTNJ) and AB California Intermediate Municipal ETF (CAM) belong to the same industry segment: Municipal Bonds. Both ETFs have the same top 1 sector exposures: Municipal. FTNJ is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.27% for CAM. FTNJ is down -4.54% year-to-date (YTD) with +$52M in YTD flows. CAM performs better with -1.32% YTD performance, and +$106M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FTNJ and CAM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FTNJ vs CAM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FTNJ CAM | -1.78%-1.02% | -5.45%-2.62% | -4.54%-1.32% | n/a-0.46% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | FTNJ CAM | +$14M+$4M | +$17M+$21M | +$52M+$106M | -+$125M | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FTNJ CAM | +5.25%+3.19% | n/a+2.11% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | FTNJ CAM | -6.90%-3.74% | n/a-4.26% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | FTNJ CAM | 92d90d | n/a226d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
FTNJ | CAM | |
Last sale 10/15/2026 at 4:27 PM | $8.38 | $24.31 |
| Previous close 10/14/2026 | $8.30 | $24.18 |
| Consolidated volume 10/14/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
FTNJ | CAM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $8.38 | $24.31 |
| 1D performance | +0.99% | +0.54% |
| AuM | $183.74 M | $1.18 B |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.27% |
FTNJ | CAM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Franklin Templeton | AllianceBernstein |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 52 | 138 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 10, 2025 | October 3, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15