FTMSvsWTMUETF Comparison
Franklin Short-Term Municipal Income ETF (FTMS) and WisdomTree Core Laddered Municipal Fund (WTMU) belong to the same industry segment: Municipal Bonds. Both ETFs have the same top 1 sector exposures: Municipal. FTMS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.22%, versus 0.25% for WTMU. FTMS is down -0.98% year-to-date (YTD) with +$73M in YTD flows. WTMU performs worse with -1.99% YTD performance, and +$3M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FTMS and WTMU below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FTMS vs WTMU performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FTMS WTMU | -0.29%-0.10% | -1.34%-2.57% | -0.98%-1.99% | n/a-1.19% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | FTMS WTMU | +$25M- | +$45M- | +$73M+$3M | -+$4M | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FTMS WTMU | +2.06%+4.23% | n/a+2.69% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | FTMS WTMU | -2.33%-4.84% | n/a-6.14% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | FTMS WTMU | 92d92d | n/a232d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
FTMS | WTMU | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $9.78 | $24.62 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $9.79 | $24.67 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
FTMS | WTMU | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $9.78 | $24.62 |
| 1D performance | -0.10% | -0.19% |
| AuM | $232.32 M | $8.89 M |
| E/R | 0.22% | 0.25% |
FTMS | WTMU | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Franklin Templeton | WisdomTree |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 47 | 17 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 24, 2025 | April 2, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15