FTMSvsMFSMETF Comparison
Franklin Short-Term Municipal Income ETF (FTMS) and MFS Active Intermediate Muni Bond ETF (MFSM) belong to the same industry segment: Municipal Bonds. Both ETFs have the same top 1 sector exposures: Municipal. FTMS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.22%, versus 0.34% for MFSM. FTMS is down -0.98% year-to-date (YTD) with +$73M in YTD flows. MFSM performs worse with -1.74% YTD performance, and +$73M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FTMS and MFSM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FTMS vs MFSM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FTMS MFSM | -0.29%-0.34% | -1.34%-3.45% | -0.98%-1.74% | n/a-1.03% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | FTMS MFSM | +$25M+$19M | +$45M+$24M | +$73M+$73M | -+$76M | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FTMS MFSM | +2.06%+5.24% | n/a+3.20% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | FTMS MFSM | -2.33%-6.07% | n/a-6.71% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | FTMS MFSM | 92d92d | n/a102d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
FTMS | MFSM | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $9.78 | $23.97 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $9.79 | $23.95 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
FTMS | MFSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $9.78 | $23.97 |
| 1D performance | -0.10% | +0.07% |
| AuM | $232.32 M | $120.73 M |
| E/R | 0.22% | 0.34% |
FTMS | MFSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Franklin Templeton | MFS |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 47 | 101 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 24, 2025 | December 4, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
