FTMSvsFTMHETF Comparison
Franklin Short-Term Municipal Income ETF (FTMS) and Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF (FTMH) belong to the same industry segment: Municipal Bonds. Both ETFs have the same top 1 sector exposures: Municipal. FTMS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.22%, versus 0.35% for FTMH. FTMS is up 0.25% year-to-date (YTD) with +$29M in YTD flows. FTMH performs worse with -0.31% YTD performance, and +$41M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FTMS and FTMH below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FTMS vs FTMH performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FTMS FTMH | +0.09%-0.80% | -0.10%-2.02% | +0.25%-0.31% | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | FTMS FTMH | -$2M+$13M | +$8M+$9M | +$29M+$41M | -- | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FTMS FTMH | +1.09%+3.60% | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | FTMS FTMH | -0.77%-3.35% | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | FTMS FTMH | 62d62d | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
FTMS | FTMH | |
Last sale 9/1/2026 at 1:30 PM | $9.87 | $11.38 |
| Previous close 08/31/2026 | $9.90 | $11.49 |
| Consolidated volume 08/31/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
FTMS | FTMH | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $9.87 | $11.38 |
| 1D performance | -0.30% | -1.00% |
| AuM | $190.65 M | $574.19 M |
| E/R | 0.22% | 0.35% |
FTMS | FTMH | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Franklin Templeton | Franklin Templeton |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 48 | 96 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 24, 2025 | October 24, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
