FTMHvsPUSHETF Comparison
VS
Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF (FTMH) and PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF (PUSH) belong to the same industry segment: Municipal Bonds. FTMH's top 1 sector exposures are Municipal. In contrast, PUSH's top sector exposures are Municipal and Non-Corporate. FTMH is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.15% for PUSH. FTMH is down -1.4% year-to-date (YTD) with +$41M in YTD flows. PUSH performs better with 1.98% YTD performance, and +$78M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FTMH and PUSH below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FTMH vs PUSH performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/01/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FTMH PUSH | -1.42%+0.39% | -3.09%+0.74% | -1.40%+1.98% | n/a+3.03% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | FTMH PUSH | +$13M+$18M | +$9M+$28M | +$41M+$78M | -+$88M | -- | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FTMH PUSH | +4.15%+0.49% | n/a+0.50% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | FTMH PUSH | -4.41%-0.18% | n/a-0.35% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | FTMH PUSH | 63d20d | n/a45d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
Trading data
FTMH | PUSH | |
Last sale 9/2/2026 at 1:30 PM | $11.35 | $50.30 |
| Previous close 09/01/2026 | $11.38 | $50.35 |
| Consolidated volume 09/01/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/2/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FTMH | PUSH | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $11.35 | $50.30 |
| 1D performance | -0.22% | -0.10% |
| AuM | $567.94 M | $124.44 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.15% |
Characteristics
FTMH | PUSH | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Franklin Templeton | PGIM |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 96 | 70 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 24, 2025 | June 28, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FTMH
USA
26.88%
Other
73.12%
PUSH
USA
25.92%
Other
74.08%
Sectors
FTMH
Municipal
26.88%
Other
73.12%
PUSH
Municipal
25.76%
Other
74.24%
Advertisement
Diversification
FTMH
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
13.99%
PUSH
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
18.17%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
FTMH
New York Transportation Development Corp., 6% 30jun2055, USD (2025)
1.65%
CSCDA Community Improvement Authority, 3.125% 1aug2056, USD (2021A-2)
1.29%
US389526AJ35
1.00%
Puerto Rico, 4% 1jul2041, USD
0.99%
US57420VSP93
0.97%
Illinois Finance Authority, 5% 15feb2047, USD (2017A)
0.96%
Detroit, 4% 1apr2044, USD
0.89%
US650116GY64
0.84%
Chicago Board of Education, 5.75% 1dec2050, USD (2025A)
0.84%
New York Liberty Development Corp., 3% 15sep2043, USD (2015B)
0.81%
New York Transportation Development Corp., 4% 1jan2036, USD (2018)
0.80%
US51404PAK57
0.77%
Kentucky Public Energy Authority, 5% 1dec2033, USD (2025)
0.74%
US88035RDN17
0.73%
US88035UPA96
0.72%
PUSH
US60528ACC62
2.29%
US92162PAM77
1.51%
Michigan Finance Authority, 5% 1dec2037, USD (2017A)
1.51%
US04062PCC32
1.49%
Main Street Natural Gas Inc., 4% 1jul2052, USD (2021A)
1.28%
Kentucky Public Energy Authority, 4% 1feb2050, USD
1.16%
US880443JF46
1.13%
US60528ACF93
1.05%
Chandler Industrial Development Authority, 4% 1jun2049, USD (2019)
1.05%
Texas Municipal Gas Acquisition and Supply Corp., 5.5% 1jan2054, USD (2023A)
1.03%
Southeast Energy Authority, 5.25% 1jan2054, USD (2023A)
0.98%
US57584XEF42
0.95%
Main Street Natural Gas Inc., 4% 1mar2050, USD
0.92%
US13034AD230
0.92%
US781741AV51
0.91%
Frequently asked questions about FTMH and PUSH
How have the FTMH and PUSH ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 1, 2026, FTMH is down -1.4% year-to-date (YTD), while PUSH has returned 1.98%. That puts PUSH better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FTMH or PUSH?
Year-to-date, the FTMH ETF saw +$41M in flows, compared to +$78M for PUSH.
Which ETF is bigger: FTMH or PUSH?
As of September 1, 2026, FTMH holds $567.94 M in assets under management (AUM), while PUSH manages $124.44 M.
What sectors do the FTMH and PUSH ETFs invest in?
FTMH leans toward sectors like Municipal. Meanwhile, PUSH focuses on Municipal.
What are the top holdings of the FTMH ETF and PUSH ETF?
FTMH top holdings include New York Transportation Development Corp., 6% 30jun2055, USD (2025), CSCDA Community Improvement Authority, 3.125% 1aug2056, USD (2021A-2) and US389526AJ35. PUSH holds in its top three: US60528ACC62, US92162PAM77 and Michigan Finance Authority, 5% 1dec2037, USD (2017A).
Which ETF is more diversified: FTMH or PUSH?
FTMH holds 495 securities with 13.99% of its assets in the top 15. PUSH has 284 securities and a top 15 weight of 18.17%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
